• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CORPORATION TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CORPORATION TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number 466P306AU
Device Problem Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problems Pulmonary Embolism (1498); Coagulation Disorder (1779); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Date 08/01/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Reporter occupation: other, senior counsel, litigation.(b)(4).It was reported that a patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused pulmonary embolism (pe) and tilt.The patient reported becoming aware of filter tilt, blood clots, clotting and/or occlusion of the inferior vena cava, approximately fifteen years post implant.The patient also reported anxiety, depression, filter clogging and discomfort.According to the medical records the indication for the filter implant was pulmonary embolism and recurrent deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities despite therapeutic anticoagulation therapy.The filter was placed via the right internal jugular vein and deployed below the renal veins and appeared to be well aligned.The procedure was well tolerated.The product was not returned for analysis.A review of the device history record revealed no anomalies during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported complaint.The trapease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Recurrent pulmonary embolism is a known potential complication of filter implantation and is listed in the instructions for use (ifu) as such.Blood clots, clotting, and device occlusion related to clotting do not indicate a device malfunction.Rather, patient, vessel characteristics and pharmacological factors may have contributed to these events.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with practitioner technique and/or vessel anatomy, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.Without imaging available for review the event could not be confirmed nor a cause attributed.Anxiety does not represent a device malfunction and may be related to underlying patient specific issues.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.Please note that this is the initial report for this product.
 
Event Description
As reported by the legal brief, the patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The report states that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damage to the patient including, but not limited to pulmonary embolism (pe) and tilt.As a direct and proximate result of these malfunctions, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages, and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer significant medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages.Additional information received per the medical records indicate that the patient has a history of pulmonary embolism, recurrent deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities despite therapeutic anticoagulation therapy.The filter was deployed via the patient's right internal jugular vein.The filter was placed below the renal veins and appeared to be well aligned.The procedure was well tolerated.  additional information received per the patient profile form (ppf) states that the patient experienced filter tilt, blood clots, clotting and/or occlusion of the inferior vena cava.The patient became aware of the reported events approximately fifteen years after the index procedure.The patient has also experienced anxiety, depression, filter clogging and discomfort.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI
Type of Device
FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes FL 33014
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes FL 33014
Manufacturer Contact
karla castro
14201 nw 60th ave
miami lakes, FL 33014
7863138372
MDR Report Key12264602
MDR Text Key264825648
Report Number1016427-2021-05228
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
UDI-Device Identifier20705032009451
UDI-Public20705032009451
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K020316
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/02/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/02/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number466P306AU
Device Catalogue Number466P306AU
Device Lot NumberR0305225
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/09/2021
Date Device Manufactured03/16/2005
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
TRAPEASE INTRODUCER SET; UNKNOWN 0.018 INCH GUIDE WIRE; UNKNOWN 0.035 INCH GUIDE WIRE; UNKNOWN 21-GAUGE NEEDLE; UNKNOWN MICROPUNCTURE SHEATH
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age42 YR
-
-