SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. REF INTERFIT THRD HOLE COVER; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 71330001 |
Device Problem
Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/09/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that, during a tha surgery, after implanting the r3 3 hole acet shell 56mm cup, a ref interfit third hole cover central screw was implanted, which eventually got blocked and its extraction was impossible.Surgeon was forced to remove the already implanted r3 3 hole acet shell 56mm and replace it with another of the same size; surgeon decides to implant it without a central screw.Surgery was completed successfully after a non significant delay, without any harm to the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, it is noted operative reports or x-rays are not available.Smith and nephew has not received the device/ adequate materials to fully evaluate the complaint, but if additional clinically relevant materials are later received, then the case may be re-opened for further evaluation.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history did not reveal additional complaints for the listed batch.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode was previously identified.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Some potential probable causes for this event could include a fit/sizing issue or poor insertion technique.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The associated device, used in treatment, was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device confirmed the stated failure mode.The hexagonal hole is stripped, rendering the device inoperative.The device shows signs of extensive use.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that it is noted operative reports or x-rays are not available.Smith and nephew has not received the device/ adequate materials to fully evaluate the complaint, but if additional clinically relevant materials are later received, then the case may be re-opened for further evaluation.A review of complaint history did not reveal additional complaints for the listed batch.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use documents revealed this failure mode and potential harm was previously identified.Some potential probable causes for this event could include a fit/ sizing issue or poor insertion technique.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device confirmed the stated failure mode.The hexagonal hole is stripped, rendering the device inoperative.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that operative reports and / or x-rays are not available.Smith and nephew has not received adequate clinical materials to fully evaluate the complaint, but if additional clinically relevant materials are later received, then the case may be re-opened for further evaluation.A review of complaint history did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file and instructions for use document revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Some potential causes for this event could include a fit / sizing issue or poor insertion technique.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.As there was a non significant delay due to the physical resistance of the device, it's contribution could be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|