Other relevant device(s) are: product id: asm0206, serial/lot #:(b)(4), udi#: (b)(4), device evaluated by manufacturer?: a medtronic representative went to the site to test the equipment.Testing revealed that the surgical arm failed an accuracy test and arm was replaced.The system then passed the system checkout and was found to be fully functional.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
Medtronic received information regarding a guidance system being used during a spinal procedure.It was reported that during a ct-fluoro, l2-s2 open case, the surgeon had deviated screws.The surgeon operated l2 left to s2 left and then l2 right to s2 right, and used a spinous process clamp to mount the surgical system to the patient.The surgeon also had difficulties registering with retractors but decided to remove them to complete registration.L2 and l3 felt "soft" so the confirmation shots were taken and the surgeon found that the s1 screw was lateral but still in the pedicle.On the right side, l2 was medial, but still within the pedicle.The screws were deviated between 3.5 - 10 mm.The surgical arm failed an advanced accuracy test and was suspected to be the cause of the deviation.There was no patient harm and the procedure was delayed less than an hour.
|
H3: analysis of the surgical arm found the complaint was confirmed.Visual/physical examination and functional testing found surgical arm failed an accuracy test, the j4 encoder failed, the j4 plastic cover was broken, the j4 harmonic drive failed, the j4 bearing failed, the j4 axis failed, the j1 body failed, the j1 motor screw was covered, the j1 rubber o-ring was worn/torn, the j1 usb cover was the old version, and the j6 handle was the old version.The surgical arm was repaired, recalibrated and passed all testing.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|