• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES GMBH UNK - PLATES: TITANIUM MESH IMPLANT; PLATE,FIXATION,BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES GMBH UNK - PLATES: TITANIUM MESH IMPLANT; PLATE,FIXATION,BONE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hematoma (1884); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Visual Disturbances (2140); Post Operative Wound Infection (2446)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is for an unknown plates: titanium mesh implant/unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the review of the following journal article: zeller., et al (2020) self-centering second-generation patient-specific functionalized implants for deep orbital reconstruction, j stomatol oral maxillofac surg xxx (xxxx) xxx¿xxx (germany).This study aims to clarify whether the novel method for analyzing the orbital implant fit could be used as an additional tool for intraoperative quality control and for transferring the virtual plan more precisely into the patient.Between 2014 and 2020, the department´s database was screened for patients who were treated with an additively manufactured, second-generation patient-specific titanium orbital implant with self-centering design features (stabilizers).In total, 31 patients were eligible and could be included in the study group (self-centering design).Patients who had received cad-based individualized titanium orbital implants without a self-centering design were assigned to the control group (n=50).Of those 50 patients, 7 implants were excluded according to the exclusion criteria.Finally, 42 implants met the criteria and were subjected to the implant fit analysis (ifa).Implants assigned to the control group shared the following characteristics: cad-based individual titanium orbital implants, orbital fan mesh plates (depuy synthes, switzerland) that were pre-formed and -bent on a 3d-printed bio model of the patient based on mirroring.Implants assigned to the study group shared the following characteristics: additively manufactured titanium implants, preventive design (¿¿inverted snow shovel design¿¿, and a circular, rounded implant border), and functionalization features including measurements and tracks for intraoperative navigation and insertion.Transconjunctival approaches without lateral canthotomy or transcaruncular extension were used for all cases.After insertion and correct placement, all implants were secured with 1 single titanium screw with either a 1.1 mm (kls martin, tuttlingen germany), 1.3 mm (depuy synthes, compact system), or 1.55 mm (matrix midface, depuy synthes) in diameter, depending on surgeon¿s preference or the manufacturer's specifications.As a part of the local, standardized follow-up scheme, patients were examined at 1, 4, and 12 ( 2) weeks.The following complications were reported as follows: revision surgery for repositioning was needed in only one case.Even though the implant position was exactly as planned, one case needed revision surgery due to a transient postoperative partial palsy of the inferior rectus muscle.During revision surgery, no entrapment of the muscle was found and the implant position was not changed.Without further measures being taken, the partial palsy disappeared after ten days.Intraorbital hematoma.Severe bleeding.Deep wound infections.At 12 weeks, 33 of 42 patients with cad-based-individualized implants could be followed up.Two patients showed a motility disturbance and 7 still had diplopia 12 weeks ( 2 weeks) after surgery.In the study group, 18 patients attended the 12 weeks follow-up, and 3 were lost to follow-up.Three patients suffered from double vision and 1 of them showed motility disturbance.Implant fit analysis revealed a significantly more precise (p < 0.001) positioning in the study group (n = 22/31) than in the control group (n = 42/50).This report is for an unknown synthes individual titanium orbital implants, orbital fan mesh plates, 1.3 mm (depuy synthes, compact system), or 1.55 mm (matrix midface).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK - PLATES: TITANIUM MESH IMPLANT
Type of Device
PLATE,FIXATION,BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES GMBH
eimattstrasse 3
oberdorf 4436
SZ  4436
Manufacturer Contact
kara ditty-bovard
1302 wright lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key12354179
MDR Text Key267682954
Report Number8030965-2021-07068
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/26/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/23/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/26/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-