MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 97715 |
Device Problems
Overheating of Device (1437); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problem
Burn(s) (1757)
|
Event Date 01/28/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Concomitant medical products: product id 97755 lot# serial# (b)(4), product type: recharger.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 97755, serial/lot #: (b)(4), udi#: (b)(4) date of event: date is approximate.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a patient (pt) who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).It was reported that they had a recharger (rtm) issue.Pt reported that they are having a lot of problems with the rtm and they have "tried everything" to troubleshoot.Pt explained that the cord going into the paddle is getting hot.Pt reported that because the rtm cord is getting hot, the cord burns the pt's back "a little".The pt was asked if there was a mark left on their skin.Pt confirmed there was a mark left on their skin, but noted they are fine.Pt stated that the issue occurs every other time they use the rtm.Pt confirmed all of these issues started about 6 months ago (year valid), and they called the manufacturer representative (rep) a couple of months ago, on a sunday, to address the issue.Pt stated that after speaking with the rep, the rtm worked "a little bit", but within the last month, the cord getting hot started to become more frequent.An email was sent to the repair department to replace the device.Additional information received from the manufacturer representative.It was reported that they do not recall/remember being notified of this event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Continuation of d10: product id 97755 lot# serial# (b)(6)
implanted: explanted: product type recharger medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received.It was reported the patient was sent a different recharger and the issue was resolved.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Continuation of d10: product id 97755 lot# serial# (b)(6) implanted: explanted: product type recharger h3: analysis of the recharger serial# nlf044519n found that the device was scrapped due to the recharge antenna failure of the no device found message and after failing at plexus and bench testing.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|