• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. VANTA; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. VANTA; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 977006
Device Problems Disconnection (1171); High impedance (1291); Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508)
Patient Problem Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980)
Event Date 08/24/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacturer representative regarding a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for non-malignant pain.It was reported that the patient got the new primary cell ins placed 2 weeks ago and indicated that they had no issues and had good stim prior to replacement.The rep sent values from intra-op and values from today.Impedances showed green and 40000 ohms.The caller attempted to program the ins and used the 8-15 combinations and they got rib or stomach stim- nothing of value.  it was reviewed impedances were interesting and that tech services would have to check into why values are not matching with expected colors.Caller was going to meet with patient later this week and needed next steps.Images of connectivity check and.
 
Event Description
Technical services spoke with spoke with reps about this case and interpreting impedances.Technical services (tss) reviewed how co nnectivity check and full impedance check differ and what electrodes are involved in these msrmts.Tss unable to explain why imped changed so much between aug 11 and aug 24.Discussed that it was possible that set screw didn't get tightened correctly or lead had s lipped out of header block though this was speculation.There wasn't any known trauma to pt that may explain this change in imped.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id a71200, lot# /serial# unknown, product type software.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id a71200, lot# serial# unknown, product type: software.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative (rep) reporting that the cause of the lead not being fully placed in the stimulator/being halfway out/connection issue was not determined if it was not tightened and came loose etc.The cause remains unknown.The physician had no additional information to provide.It was indicated that the provided information had been confirmed with the physician.No further complications were reported/anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: (b)(4), serial#: unknown, product type: software.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received, from the manufacturer representative (rep).Reporting that the cause of the high impedances was, due to the lead not fully being placed inside the stimulator (wires were not properly seated in the battery).A revision occurred on (b)(6) 2021.The impedances were checked, prior to the procedure.And the procedure revealed, that the lead was halfway out of stimulator.Therefore, the lead was placed back in the stimulator.And the torque wrench was used to tighten the connection.The issue was resolved.And impedances were within range post procedure.The patient was receiving comfortable stimulation.
 
Event Description
The patient had their first post-op session on (b)(6) 2021 and all contact pairs with 0-7 were showing greater than 40,000 ohms.It was noted that during implant, the manufacturer representative heard the physician tighten the setscrew correctly as she heard the click.The patient denies any falls.The patient is schedule for an x-ray of the pocket.Review of previously submitted information show that intra-op impedances ranged from about 697 ohms to 18,497 ohms.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VANTA
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
MDR Report Key12379362
MDR Text Key268533080
Report Number3004209178-2021-13035
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00763000411923
UDI-Public00763000411923
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/28/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/27/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/14/2023
Device Model Number977006
Device Catalogue Number977006
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/22/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age37 YR
-
-