It was reported that a perforation, pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade occurred.A left atrial appendage (laa) closure procedure was being performed.A double curve watchman truseal access system (was) was positioned and a 24mm watchman flx laa closure device & delivery system (wds) were used.There was trace amount of fluid noted in the transverse sinus but otherwise no pericardial effusion was noted before the procedure.The 24mm watchman flx device was implanted with just one deployment, and no recaptures or partial recaptures were performed.Sweeps were performed before device deployment and after release criteria was checked.The effusion was noted after release criteria was discussed.After the device was implanted the patient's blood pressure dropped, heart rate increased and there was some right atrium collapse and a large pericardial effusion was noted posterior to the heart near the left ventricle and left atrium.With time the perforation was noted on transesophageal echo (tee) imaging to be in the laa.Initially a pericardiocentesis was performed to manage the pericardial effusion.Once it became clear that the perforation was not going to seal or clot off the patient was taken to surgery.Surgery was performed and three sutures were used to repair the perforation.The watchman flx device remains implanted.The patient did well and was expected to be discharged a few days post surgery.It remains unclear when exactly the perforation occurred but most likely it seemed to have happened during the time of the was entry into the left atrium/laa and pigtail catheter entry into the left atrium/laa.
|