This complaint was reopened in reference to (b)(4).Manufacturing site evaluation: manufacturing and quality control data the progav¿ 2.0 was manufactured by a qualified employee in february 2016.Deviations during assembly did not occur.The valve was sterilized by miethke and released for shipment after final inspection.The progav¿ 2.0 has a normal pressure range of 0 to 20 cmh2o.The valve was inspected as article fx428t.All parameters have been inspected and approved during the manufacturing process.All parameters have been assessed as meeting specification.Device examination: the valve was received in strong, presumably bloody moldy liquid in the provided returnkit.The condition of the product is rated as the highest risk level.Therefore, a device investigation was not possible due to the return condition.Result: a definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without a physical examination of the complaint device.However, manufacturing defects at the time of release have been excluded.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke (b)(4).No further regulatory actions are required.
|