|
Model Number M0063902010 |
Device Problem
Unsealed Device Packaging (1444)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/10/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device code (b)(4).The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an escape basket sterile pouch was found torn on (b)(6) 2021.During unpacking of the shipping box, one of escape basket sterile pouches was found to be torn.This event did not occur during a procedure, did not involve a patient, and occurred outside of an operating room.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an escape basket sterile pouch was found torn on (b)(6) 2021.During unpacking of the shipping box, one of escape basket sterile pouches was found to be torn.This event did not occur during a procedure, did not involve a patient, and occurred outside of an operating room.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Block h6: device code a020503 captures the reportable event of packaging seal compromised.Block h10: the returned escape basket was analyzed, and a visual evaluation noted that the was received with the connected luer and the basket was in an open position.No bents or kinks was noted on the sheath.The pouch was returned opened and a tear in the manufacturing seal was noted.Based on all available information, the most probable root cause is cause not established since the investigation findings do not lead to a clear conclusion about the cause of the reported adverse event.There is no evidence of a manufacturing issue, design or user issue which could have caused the complaint.As per external support form it was concluded that the manufacturing process has enough controls to assure the product performance.Most likely procedural factors as handling of the device boxes prior to use, could have led to the reported event.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.A search of the complaint database confirmed that no similar complaints exist for the specified lot.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the instructions for use (ifu) / product label.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|