• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750CM26A
Device Problems Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Difficult to Remove (1528); Device Slipped (1584)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 08/05/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is still ongoing.
 
Event Description
As reported by the field clinical specialist (fcs), during a transfemoral tavr procedure for a 26mm sapien 3 valve, there was difficulties withdrawing the delivery system and crimped valve into the esheath.The devices were removed as a unit, but the valve dislodged from the balloon.The valve would not cross the native annulus.The team tried to change the angle and added 1cc to the balloon, but were not successful.It was decided to remove the devices in order to perform a bav.However, they were not able to get the valve all the way back into the esheath.The team removed the devices as one unit, but the system got 'stuck' right at the level of the skin, and the physician pulled the system.The system and esheath exited the body, but the valve came off of the delivery system and was left in the body, right under the skin at the access site.The valve was removed with hemostats; a 16fr was inserted for hemostasis.A bav was done and a 2nd valve was used and implanted without issue.The vascular surgeon was called and repaired the vessel.The patient is stable and doing well.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction to h6 based on additional information received.The device was not returned to edwards lifesciences for evaluation, however, a device history record (dhr) review was done, and did not reveal any manufacturing nonconformance issues that would have contributed to the complaint event.A lot history review was performed and revealed no other complaints relating to the reported event were identified.Imagery was provided by the facility for evaluation and the following was observed: the patient's native valve was calcified, the right access vessel was tortuous, and after removal of the devices, the valve remained under the skin at the access site.The following instructions for use (ifu) were reviewed: ifu for commander delivery system, device preparation manual, and procedural training manual.Based on this review, no ifu/training deficiencies were identified.The complaints for difficulty to withdraw system with valve through the esheath and thv dislodged off balloon were confirmed by the provided imagery.However, the complaint for difficulty to cross the native annulus was unable to be confirmed as applicable procedural imagery was not provided.Due to the unavailability of the complaint device, engineering was unable to perform any visual inspection, functional testing, or dimensional analysis.Therefore, the presence of a manufacturing non-conformance was unable to be determined.However, based on a review of the dhr, complaint history, and lot history, there is no evidence to confirm that a manufacturing non-conformance contributed to the complaint.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.The complaint description states, 'the valve would not cross the native annulus.' as per the provided imagery, the patient's native valve was calcified.It is possible that presence of calcification in the annulus obstructed the valve from being placed in the annulus, causing difficulty in advancing the valve to the annulus.Available information suggests that patient factors (calcification) may have contributed to the complaint event.The complaint description states, 'the team removed the devices as one unit, but the system got 'stuck' right at the level of the skin, and the physician pulled the system.The system and esheath exited the body, but the valve came off of the delivery system and was left in the body right under the skin.The valve got caught on the perclose suture inside the vessel.They pulled too hard and the perclose suture broke/tore the vessel.' patient imagery revealed tortuosity of the right access vessel.The presence of tortuosity can result in the creation of sub-optimal angles during delivery system withdrawal that may lead to non-coaxial alignment.Such non-coaxiality can contribute to withdrawal difficulties as the valve likely caught on the esheath tip, resulting in the shifting of the valve toward the distal tip.Additionally, the valve caught on the sutures of perclose device.If the valve was not withdrawn completely into the valve before the unit is withdrawn from the patient, the valve is exposed and may catch on the sutures, resulting in the valve dislodgment from the balloon.Available information suggests that patient (tortuosity) and procedural factors (interaction with sutures) may have contributed to the complaint event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective and preventative actions nor a product risk assessment (pra) are required at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
MDR Report Key12410564
MDR Text Key270067192
Report Number2015691-2021-04956
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103207835
UDI-Public(01)00690103207835(17)230302(10)63675158
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/22/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/01/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/02/2023
Device Model Number9750CM26A
Device Catalogue Number9750CM26A
Device Lot Number63675158
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/15/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-