Model Number TPL0059 |
Device Problems
Display or Visual Feedback Problem (1184); Imprecision (1307); Unintended Collision (1429)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/19/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Other relevant device(s) are: product id: asm0206-01s, serial/lot #: (b)(4), udi#: (b)(4), device evaluated by manufacturer?: a medtronic representative went to the site to test the equipment.Testing revealed that the surgical arm failed the 10 point accuracy test.The surgical arm was replaced and the system was working according to specifications.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received information regarding a guidance system being used during a spinal procedure.It was reported that the surgical arm passed an accuracy test prior to the procedure.During the procedure, the 3define scan did not register correctly and the surgical arm collided with the patient when being sent for c-arm registration shots.After this, the case was restarted and the surgeon proceeded with placing screws.The screws were way off from the plan.The surgical arm was tested after the procedure and the arm failed the 10 point accuracy test.There was no patient harm and the procedure was delayed less than an hour.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received from a manufacturer representative reported that a minimally invasive l4-l5 tlif was done.The l4 and l5 screws on the left side deviated.It was unknown how much the screws were deviated.Troubleshooting involved restarting the whole case, reattaching the 3define lense, taking new images and re-registering the patient.The use of the guidance system was aborted and the procedure was completed with navigation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3: analysis results of the surgical arm were not available as of the date of this report.A follow up report will be submitted when analysis is complete.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3: analysis of the surgical arm found the complaint was confirmed.Visual/physical examination and functional testing found the surgical arm failed an accuracy test, the flange of j6 was loose, the j2 and j4 plastic cover was broken, the j3 plastic cover was missing, the j6 wires were pressed and torn, the j6 motor harness was damaged, the j1 harmonic drive was noisy and failed, and the camera was the old version.The surgical arm was repaired, recalibrated and passed all testing.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|