• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALBER GMBH E-MOTION M25

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALBER GMBH E-MOTION M25 Back to Search Results
Model Number M25
Device Problem Misassembled During Installation (4049)
Patient Problem Bruise/Contusion (1754)
Event Date 08/25/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This event occured in (b)(6).Alber gmbh is filing this report because the device is marketed and sold in the u.S.On 02 sep 2021, during an on-site visit at the end customer by the alber district manager, the involved e-motion m25 was inspected.It was found that: the bracket on the left side of the wheelchair has come loose and therefore the tilt support height on the left side has changed, currently to 13 cm.On the left anti-tilt support a counter nut was not mounted as described in the mounting instruction.The height of the anti-tilt support on the right side is 8,5 cm, the bracket has not come loose on the right side, therefore this is an indication that the height of the anti-tippers was incorrectly set during installation.The anti-tilt support height must be max.30mm according to the mounting instruction.The actual height of both anti-tilt support is above the permissible value (30mm).We assume that the max.Permissible anti-tilt support height of both anti-tilt supports was not given before the day of the accident.The mounting of the bracket as well as the adjustment of the anti-tilt support was carried out by the responsible medical supply store.As a result of the fact that the max.Permissible anti-tilt support height was not observed, the tipping angle of the anti-tippers changes to a negative effect.The maximum tipping angle of the wheelchair to the back and the forces acting on the anti-tilt support as well to the bracket is increased if the anti-tippers are set too high.Due to the fact that the maximum tipping angle to the back was not given on the day of the accident, the anti-tippers could not prevent a complete tipping to the back and the bracket on the left side of the wheelchair came loose.The incorrect mounting of the bracket and the incorrect adjustment of the anti-tilt support led to the accident.The mounting instructions for the anti-tilt support on page 2 explicitly references to the max.Permissible anti-tilt support height.The responsible medical supply store has already rectified the holder and the anti-tilt support in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.The alber district manager has checked the rectifications carried out by the responsible medical supply store before redelivery to the customer.
 
Event Description
End customer informed by phone that on (b)(6) 2021 wanted to drive the driveway with her wheelchair and attached e-motion m25 uphill.While driving, the wheelchair tipped backwards and the anti-tippers failed, causing the end customer to fall backwards onto the back of her head.The end customer had to be treated by an emergency physician as well as in the hospital.The end customer suffered bruises.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
E-MOTION M25
Type of Device
E-MOTION M25
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALBER GMBH
vor dem weissen stein 14
albstadt 72461
GM  72461
MDR Report Key12458846
MDR Text Key270985258
Report Number3004730072-2021-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ITI
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K192618
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Remedial Action Inspection
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/01/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/13/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberM25
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/01/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/05/2021
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-