• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. OES CYSTONEPHROFIBERSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. OES CYSTONEPHROFIBERSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number CYF-5
Device Problem Microbial Contamination of Device (2303)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/12/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Olympus medical systems corp.(omsc) was informed that as a result of routine microbiological testing by the user facility, following microbes were detected from the sample collected from the subject device.Instrument channel: paenibacillus sp.(1 cfu/endoscope).The device had been manually reprocessed using peracetic acid.There was no report of infection associated with this report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The subject device in this report has not been returned to omsc for evaluation but was returned to olympus europa se & co.Kg (oekg).The evaluation is in progress currently.The exact cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined at this time.If additional information becomes available, this report will be supplemented.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide additional information.The device was returned to olympus (b)(4) for evaluation.(b)(4) sent the device to a third party laboratory for microbiological testing.As a result of the testing, the sample collected from the all channels of the device tested positive for unspecified microbes (<1 cfu/endoscope).The testing result cleared the (b)(6) guideline.The device was evaluated at (b)(4).As a result of the evaluation, it was confirmed that the adhesive of the bending section rubber was peeled off.The exact cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined.Based on the following investigation results, it is unlikely that the culture test result was positive due to a device malfunction.The causal relationship between the reported event and the repair location was unclear, as perforations were confirmed in the instrument channel but the location where the bacteria were detected could not be identified.Samples were collected from all channels after (b)(4) reprocessed the device according to the instruction manual.The culture test results for the collected samples were negative.Olympus medical systems corp.(omsc) confirmed that the instruction manual of the device describes the reprocessing procedure.Device history record (dhr) review indicates that the product was manufactured and tested in accordance with all applicable procedures and met all final product release criteria.If additional information becomes available, this report will be supplemented.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OES CYSTONEPHROFIBERSCOPE
Type of Device
CYSTONEPHROFIBERSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key12472096
MDR Text Key280876743
Report Number8010047-2021-11724
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K032092
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/11/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/14/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberCYF-5
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/02/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/20/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/07/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-