Model Number 97714 |
Device Problems
Display or Visual Feedback Problem (1184); Failure to Interrogate (1332); Delayed Charge Time (2586); Battery Problem (2885); Charging Problem (2892); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/02/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was received from a manufacturer representative regarding a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for unknown indications for use.Caller reports about 3-4 weeks ago, patient's ins battery started to deplete rapidly.Caller reports patient charged her device to full last night and today, patient's ins is depleted.Caller reports she cannot interrogate patient's device.No symptoms were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Continuation of d10: product id 37791 lot# serial# unknown implanted: explanted: product type recharger medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep).The rep stated it the cause of the cause of the ins depleting rapidly and inability to interrogate was unknown but they were meeting with the patient on (b)(6)/21.The rep called back with the patient and needed to know what could cause patient's device to deplete rapidly.When checking recharge history, it shows patient has charged only twice in the last 30 days.First time to 75% and the second to 50%.However, the patient states this is not accurate as they have charged many times.Patient is currently charging with 8 bars coupling.It was advised to charge as much as possible and keep track of how long they've been charging and see if it shows in the recharge history before patient leaves.If this recharge session still doesn't show then they could possibly look at replacing the recharge antenna.The rep called again and reported that the patient had been recharging and using stimulation normally but about a month ago it started not holding a charge.Rep stated patient reported it took "hours" to charge last night to full (stim was off) and it was depleted for the appointment today already.Rep stated the tablet stats for yesterday's session show 56 minutes to 50% and median coupling has been 0.Patient also indicated they had some trouble getting good coupling yesterday.Rep stated they've been charging ins for the last 20 minutes and it took some time getting good coupling but then was on 8 bars and dropped to 0 at some point but then back to 8 bars again.Rep stated they met with the patient last week as well and patient charged the night before and the morning of the appointment but ins was still depleted by the time they got to the appointment.Recharger stats showed many sessions where coupling was poor or little recharging occurred due to lack of coupling.It was reviewed that a replacement antenna would be sent and to have the patient keep diary of charging sessions and come back in a few weeks to review stats again.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received from a representative.It was reported that the issue was resolved.The device was not going to be returned as the customer refused to return the device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient that was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).The rep reported that it is still unknown what the cause was but believes it was due to the over-discharge.The rep also stated that the device was replaced with an intellis device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|