• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC UNKNOWN; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC UNKNOWN; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problems Obstruction of Flow (2423); Structural Problem (2506); Device Tipped Over (2589)
Patient Problems Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Anxiety (2328); Depression (2361); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Initial reporter occupation: non-healthcare professional.Investigation the reported allegations have been investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: organ/vena cava perforation, tilt.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Filter tilt has been reported.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt.Excessive filter tilt may contribute to difficult or failed retrieval; vena cava wall penetration/perforation; and (or) result in loss of filter efficiency.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: unacceptable filter tilt.Catalog number and lot number are unknown.The alleged tulip is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.
 
Event Description
The following information is alleged: the patient received a gunther tulip inferior vena cava (ivc) filter on (b)(6) 2009.The patient experienced multiple perforations of the ivc.One of these struts perforated the duodenum, and one perforated the l2 anterior inferior endplate and l2-l3 disc.The patients' filter also had 26.62 degrees of coronal tilt and 11.15 degrees of sagittal tilt.The patient has reportedly expired.Specific details surrounding the patient's expiration are currently unknown, and there is currently no reported allegation of wrongful death.Hospital and medical records have been requested, but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: the following allegations have been investigated: thrombus , migration, anxiety, worry, depression.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Ivc occlusion/ thrombosis, new dvt, ivc stenosis as a reported complication, is a known risk in relation to filter implant and is well documented in the clinical literature and in clinical practice guidelines.This is supported by the clinical evidence report established to assess available clinical data to identify and evaluate the clinical safety and performance of the cook vena cava filters.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: vena cava occlusion or thrombosis, vena cava stenosis, deep vein thrombosis.Filter or filter fragment migration and (or) embolization (e.G., movement to the heart or lungs) has been reported.Filter or filter fragment movement has occurred in both the cranial and caudal direction and may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters smaller or larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; deployment into thrombus; dislodgement due to large thrombus burdens; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: filter migration, trauma to adjacent structures.Unknown if the reported anxiety, worry, depression is directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.Catalog number and lot number are unknown; however, the alleged tulip is manufactured and inspected according to controls.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
Patient allegedly received an implant in (b)(6) 2009 via the right common femoral vein due to deep vein thrombosis (dvt), intra cranial hemorrhage, and unable to anticoagulate.The patient alleges device tilt, vena cava and organ perforation.Additional allegations include: anxiety, worry, depression, and hospitalization for blood clots post filter placement.Reportedly, the patient expired (b)(6) 2020 but it has not been indicated that the ivc filter contributed to this outcome.Death certificate has been requested.Per a computed tomography (ct) abdomen and pelvis: "caval perforation: yes.Grade 4 perforation of 11 o'clock strut into duodenum.Grade 4 perforation of 6 o'clock strut into the l2 anterior inferior endplate and the l2-3 disc.Grade 2 perforation 9 o'clock strut 0.72 cm.Tilt: yes.11.15 degrees of sagittal and 26.62 degrees of coronal tilt.Apex of filter extends to the common to the into the left renal vein confluence.Migration: yes.Apex of filter at level of left renal vein confluence.Pertinent negatives: no ivc stenosis.Additional findings: no definite fracture or missing struts identified".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.Per quality engineering review, the additional information provided for this complaint does not change the previous investigation conclusion.Therefore, no new investigation activities will be conducted at this time.Cook will reopen the investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.Catalog number and lot number are unknown, however, the alleged tulip is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications, and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
Per certificate of death, dated (b)(6) 2020, immediate cause of death is unspecified natural causes.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key12526619
MDR Text Key273136449
Report Number1820334-2021-02215
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/24/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/25/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Hospitalization;
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight126 KG
-
-