H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one ultraverse 035 pta dilatation catheter has returned for evaluation.A kink was able to note on the catheter, no specific damage noted on the returned device.No further testing performed due to the nature of the complaint.All the anomalies noted under the microscopic observation.One photo was reviewed.The photo shows the catheter which have a kink, no other evidence of catheter damage or break noted.Therefore, based on the photo review the reported break was unconfirmed as there is no evidence specific damage noted.However, catheter kink was able to be identified and can be confirmed based on the submitted photo.Therefore, the investigation for the reported break was unconfirmed as there is no break noted on the returned device for evaluation.However, the investigation was confirmed for material deformation as kink was able to be noted on the catheter returned for evaluation.A definitive root cause for the reported break and identified catheter kink could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: b5, d4 (expiry date: 07/2023), g3, h6 (device, method).H11: h6 (result, conclusion).H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|