• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. RESTORE SENSOR; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. RESTORE SENSOR; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 37714
Device Problems Intermittent Continuity (1121); Failure to Deliver Energy (1211); Energy Output Problem (1431); Electromagnetic Compatibility Problem (2927); Data Problem (3196); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 08/20/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a friend/family member regarding a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for non-malignant pain and failed back surgery syndrome.Information was received from a patient's representative regarding an implantable neurostimulator (ins).The reason for call was caller reported the pt have been having back pain on their left side.Pt described the pain as feeling "in the bone" and not the muscle.Caller stated the stimulator was implanted to help pain in both of the pt's legs and their back.When asked about ways the stimulator may have been impacted, the caller stated the pt was crawling around looking for a deer.Caller stated the pt is able to stand and walk but the pain is much worse when laying down.The patient was redirected to their healthcare provider to further address the issue.Caller mentioned the pt will likely have a cat scan since they can't have an mri.The patient's relevant medical history included caller mentioned the reason the pt had the stimulator implanted was related to the 5 back surgeries and a car accident they had at the age of (b)(6).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received.Patient indicated device has been returned.Patient reported explanted (b)(6) 2021.
 
Event Description
Additional information from the patient indicated that the ins was shutting off and changing intensities.They think it was getting old.The patient noted that the physician decided to replace the battery.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received.Reason for call was pt reported that for the last 6 months they have had quite a bit of back pain and had some things going on with their stimulator.Pt said that they noticed a couple of months ago that their intensity settings changed from 3.80 to.80 on their left leg while lying down and the pt said they never changed the setting and always kept the setting at 3.80.Pt also mentioned another time within the past 6 months that their intensity settings for the middle of their backchanged without them changing them too; pt said that they didn't have their patient programmer by them at the times this happened.Pss had pt look at patient programmer during the call (nmh039543n) and pt said that everything seemed to be working just fine and their settings were where they should be at.Pt said that about 6 months ago they had a heart monitor on them and their stimulation turned off without them turning it off and they were in a lot of pain.Pt said that their doctor told them that the heart monitor results just showed static.The patient was redirected to their healthcare provider to further address the issue.Pt said they have an upcoming appointment with their dr.(b)(6) on october 14th at 8:45 am.Pss emailed medtronic reps for visibility.Pt was hard to follow at points during the call as they were talking very fast.Pt called from different call back number (b)(6) and pt already has a different phone 2.Pt had somewhere to be and rushed off the call, so ps unable to confirm if the pt wanted this number updated on file.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESTORE SENSOR
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key12535825
MDR Text Key273437716
Report Number3004209178-2021-14450
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994610430
UDI-Public00613994610430
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/14/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/27/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/28/2015
Device Model Number37714
Device Catalogue Number37714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/07/2021
Date Device Manufactured06/06/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-