• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE GUNTHER TULIP NAVALIGN JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE GUNTHER TULIP NAVALIGN JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-1-JUG-TULIP
Device Problems Obstruction of Flow (2423); Structural Problem (2506); Device Tipped Over (2589); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Abdominal Pain (1685); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Occupation: non-healthcare professional.Investigation: it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information and/or no device failure provided to date.Catalog number and lot number are unknown, however, the alleged tulip is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.
 
Event Description
It is alleged that the patient received a gunther tulip inferior vena cava (ivc) filter on (b)(6) 2016, and the patient was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested, but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Additional information: (patient and device codes) g4 (510k): k172557 investigation: investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.The following allegations have been investigated: vena cava (vc) perforation, thrombosis, tilt, abdominal pain.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Ivc occlusion/ thrombosis, new dvt, ivc stenosis as a reported complication, is a known risk in relation to filter implant and is well documented in the clinical literature and in clinical practice guidelines.This is supported by the clinical evidence report established to assess available clinical data to identify and evaluate the clinical safety and performance of the cook vena cava filters.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: vena cava occlusion or thrombosis, vena cava stenosis, deep vein thrombosis.Filter tilt has been reported.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt.Excessive filter tilt may contribute to difficult or failed retrieval; vena cava wall penetration/perforation; and (or) result in loss of filter efficiency.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: unacceptable filter tilt.Unknown if the reported abdominal pain is directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.20 devices in lot.To date, no other complaints have been reported against the lot.The associated work order was reviewed.No related/relevant notes were documented.The device is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
Patient allegedly received a filter via the right internal jugular vein due to pulmonary embolism (pe).Patient is alleging device tilt and vena cava perforation.The patient notes and further alleges experiencing abdominal pain when bending over too far or sitting, resulting in the need to change position.Additionally, patient is alleging post implant blood clots.Per a computed tomography (ct) abdomen: "there is an ivc filter which is slightly tilted towards the left side at the apex.The filter is located to the right side of the l2 and l3 vertebral bodies.The superior aspect of the filter is close to the origin of the left renal vein.The distal prongs of the filter are projecting outside of the lumen.The right posterior prongs located close to the 7:00 position is projecting a centimeter outside of the lumen of the ivc into the adjacent fat.The prongs at the 10:00 position is projecting 0.6 cm from the lumen of the ivc into mesenteric fat.The prongs at the 1:0 position is projecting 0.3 cm past the lumen of the vessel into the fat in between the duodenum and ivc.The 5:00 prongs is projecting 0.4 cm in the lumen of the ivc in the fat in between the aorta and ivc.The filter is located approximately 7 cm above the bifurcation of the ivc".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GUNTHER TULIP NAVALIGN JUGULAR VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6, dk-4632
bjaeverskov
Manufacturer (Section G)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6, dk-4632
bjaeverskov
Manufacturer Contact
lissi walmann
sandet 6, dk-4632
bjaeverskov 
56868686
MDR Report Key12538077
MDR Text Key273535975
Report Number3002808486-2021-01831
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/25/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/27/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/14/2019
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-1-JUG-TULIP
Device Lot NumberE3439405
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/10/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/14/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight82 KG
-
-