It was reported that the procedure was to post-dilate a previously implanted stent in the moderately calcified left anterior descending (lad) coronary artery.The trek balloon dilatation catheter had a contrast mix of 1/3 contrast and 2/3 saline and was inflated once to nominal pressure and upon the second inflation it was found that the balloon wasn't inflating and a rupture was suspected.The pressure was not known.There was some difficulty deflating the balloon.Negative pressure was applied for about 15 seconds and when attempting to remove the balloon there was resistance with the guiding catheter and some force was used, but all devices were removed as a unit at that point.When the balloon was removed it was found that the shaft had separated but the separated portion was in the guide catheter with the rest of the device so there was no intervention.Additionally, it was noted that the balloon was not fully deflated.Another, same size balloon was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient effects and there was no delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
H10: device code 2017- contrast incorrect.Visual and functional inspections were performed on the returned device.The reported separation was confirmed; however, the reported balloon rupture and deflation issue could not be confirmed.The reported difficulty removing the device from the guiding catheter could not be replicated in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar incidents and/or complaints from this lot.The account reported that force had to be used to remove the device.It should be noted the coronary dilatation catheters (cdc), nc trek rx, global, instructions for use (ifu) state: if resistance is felt, determine the cause before proceeding.Continuing to advance or retract the catheter while under resistance may result in damage to the vessels and / or damage / separation of the catheter.In this case, it is likely that the ifu deviation contributed to the reported separation.Additionally, it was reported that the contrast mix used during the procedure was 1/3 contrast and 2/3 saline.It should be noted that the coronary dilatation catheters (cdc), nc trek rx, global instructions for use specify that the contrast is 60% contrast medium diluted 1:1 with normal saline.In this case, since the contrast ratio used was less than the required percentage it is unknown if the ifu violation caused or contributed to the reported complaint.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported balloon rupture and deflation issue.The reported difficulty removing the device appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure.The reported separation appears to be related to user error/operational context.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|