• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC GUNTHER TULIP FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC GUNTHER TULIP FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number G33016
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Structural Problem (2506)
Patient Problems Scar Tissue (2060); Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The previous medwatch report was submitted by william cook europe under manufacturer report reference #3002808486-2021-01441.Additional information provided determined that this device was manufactured by cook inc.With the submission of this initial medwatch report, cook inc.Informs that all future submissions regarding this complaint will be handled under the manufacturer report referenced in this initial medwatch report.Initial reporter occupation: non-healthcare professional.Investigation the following allegations have been investigated: unable to remove, scarring.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Physician practice guidelines and published guidance from regulatory agencies recommend that patients with indwelling filters undergo routine follow-up.The risks/benefits of filter retrieval should be considered for each patient during follow-up.Once protection from pe is no longer necessary, filter retrieval should be considered.Filter retrieval should be attempted when feasible and clinically indicated.Filter retrieval is a patient-specific, clinically complex decision; the decision to remove a filter should be based on each patients individual risk/benefit profile (e.G., a patients continued need for protection from pe compared to their experience with and (or) ongoing risk of experiencing filter-related complications).For all retrievable ivc filters, retrieval becomes more challenging with time, and this is commonly due to encapsulation of the filter legs or hook (in a tilted filter) by tissue ingrowth.The filter is designed to be retrieved with the g¿nther tulip vena cava filter retrieval set.It may also be retrieved with the cloversnare¿ vascular retriever.Cook has not performed testing to evaluate the safety or effectiveness of filter retrieval using other retrieval systems or techniques.The published clinical literature includes descriptions of alternative techniques for filter retrieval; use of these techniques varies according to physician experience, patient anatomy, and filter position.The safety or effectiveness of these alternative retrieval techniques has not been established.Specific for embedded a filter that is embedded in the wall of the ivc may be difficult to retrieve.For all retrievable ivc filters, retrieval becomes more challenging with time, and this is commonly due to encapsulation of the filter legs or hook (in a tilted filter) by tissue ingrowth.Unknown if the reported scarring are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.A total of (b)(4) devices were manufactured in the reported lot.To date, no other complaints have been reported against the lot.The associated work order was reviewed.No related/relevant notes were documented.The device is manufactured and inspected according to controls.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.
 
Event Description
Patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2012 via the right common femoral vein due to an auto accident.Unsuccessful filter retrieval on (b)(6) 2012.(b)(6) 2012, per a report from retrieval report (attempted); "the inferior vena cavagram demonstrates no evidence of caval thrombus.The right and left struts of the filter project outside of the lumen of the inferior vena cava".Unsuccessful attempt at removal of the inferior vena cava filter due to scar formation around the struts.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GUNTHER TULIP FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key12635773
MDR Text Key276693439
Report Number1820334-2021-02338
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
UDI-Device Identifier10827002330167
UDI-Public(01)10827002330167(17)150301(10)3282015
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K043509
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/14/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/14/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/01/2015
Device Model NumberG33016
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-FEM
Device Lot Number3282015
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/29/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/01/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
-
-