Corrected data d6a, g4 additional manufacturer narrative reported event: an event regarding rebushing involving a patient specific, distal femoral replacement, bumper pad was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: device evaluation and results: not performed as product was not returned.Clinician review: a review of the provided x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: the implant in situ was for distal femoral replacement which was inserted on 03aug2009.The surgeon reported instability of the knee.The x-ray images provided show that the knee components were in good position and engaged well.Therefore, the radiographic review cannot confirm that the knee is unstable, which may be due to wear of the knee bearing components based on many years of the implant in situ.Device history review: review of the product history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other events for the lot.Conclusion: it was reported the patient was in need of revision due to "knee instability".On 10jan2022 the clinician's review stated the following : " [.] the radiographic review cannot confirm that the knee is unstable, which may be due to wear of the knee bearing components based on many years of the implant in situ".The implant has been in situ for approx.12 years.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, pathology reports, progress notes, additional x-rays and return of the device are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.
|