It was reported that on (b)(6) 2021, a fred stent was implanted in the left vertebral artery.Immediately after the procedure, imaging confirmed there were no issues with the stent placement.On (b)(6), the patient was discharged.Just before discharge, mri revealed no issues.There were also no abnormalities in the patient's physical condition.On (b)(6), the patient came to the hospital with nausea and unsteadiness that caused the patient to lean to the left when walking.Dsa confirmed there was no thrombus in the area where the fred was implanted.Ozagrel was administrated.On (b)(6), since there was no improvement, mra was performed again and cerebral infarction was found in the area of the aneurysm.Pletal was additionally administrated, and tapt was continued.The patient is not paralyzed, but is still experiencing nausea and unsteadiness, and will be hospitalized for a while, as rehabilitation is necessary.The physician commented that no in-stent thrombus was confirmed by dsa.The physician's belief is that the infarction occurred in either the perforating branch originating from the fred implantation site or the perforating branch originating from the target aneurysm.
|
There was one image provided of two different 3d rotational angio views of the left vertebral artery, presumably prior to fred placement; no vessel measurement was provided.No procedural images were provided.From the event description, the investigation agrees with the physician's theory that if there was no stent thrombosis, the culprit was likely a perforator or pica infarct.Without the return and physical evaluation of the device, the investigation is unable to determine if a condition existed that would have caused or contributed to the reported event.
|