As reported, during an extraction of pelvic calculi, the basket wire of two ncircle tipless stone extractors broke.The first device (subject of this report) was used to extract stones twice before the basket wire broke.The second device (reported under patient identifier (b)(6)) was then used, and the basket wire of this device also broke.A third device was used to successfully complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Event summary: as reported, during an extraction of pelvic calculi, the basket wire of two ncircle tipless stone extractors broke.The first device (subject of this report) was used to extract stones twice before the basket wire broke.The second device (reported under patient identifier (b)(6)) was then used, and the basket wire of this device also broke.A third device was used to successfully complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation ¿ evaluation: a visual inspection and functional testing of the returned device was conducted.A document-based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, the instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, and quality control data.A device failure analysis was conducted on the returned device.The device was returned in the biohazard package.There was no label information.The collet knob and mlla (male luer lock adapter) were tight.The handle was partially closed, and the basket formation was partially closed.The one basket wire was pulled out of the distal cannula.The function test determined the handle actuates the basket formation.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other related complaints from the lot have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: precaution: enclose the device in the sheath before removing from the tray/holder.Precaution: do not use excessive force to manipulate this device.Damage to the device may occur.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was visually/functionally inspected by quality control and no related gaps in production or processing controls were noted.The returned device was found to have had 1 of the 4 basket wires pulled free from the basket cannula that secures the proximal end of the basket wires in place.The reported information stated this same issue occurred with 2 devices used during the same procedure.It is possible that there was a procedural related issue, such as the size and/or shape of the stones being removed that caused the observed damage, however no information was known regarding procedural conditions, therefore the cause of the issue could not be conclusively determined.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook medical will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|