As reported, while the doctor was preparing for an unspecified procedure, he checked the nforce nitinol helical stone extractor basket and found that the basket would not open and close normally.The doctor replaced the basket and completed the procedure.There was no impact to the patient.
|
Event summary: as reported, while the doctor was preparing for an unspecified procedure, he checked the nforce nitinol helical stone extractor basket and found that the basket would not open and close normally.The doctor replaced the basket and completed the procedure.There was no impact to the patient.Investigation ¿ evaluation.A visual inspection and functional testing of the returned device was conducted.A document-based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, the instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, and quality control data.A device failure analysis was conducted on the returned device.The product was returned inside the open pouch in the marketing box.The basket sheath was buckled/accordioned and partially severed 4cm from the mlla (male luer lock adapter).The basket sheath was buckled/accordioned 7cm from the mlla.The basket sheath and the support sheath were detached.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other related complaints from the lot have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.A lot history search found one other complaints have been reported for this lot, and it was created to address a similar issue from the same customer.Returned devices from both complaints were found to have the same failure mode.The nfhses manufacturing process is individual in nature and two complaints from the same lot is not sufficient evidence that there is a common issue that affects other devices from the lot.Because there were no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, and there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: precaution: enclose the device in the sheath before removing from the tray/holder.Precaution: do not use excessive force to manipulate this device.Damage to the device may occur.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was visually/functionally inspected by quality control and no related gaps in production or processing controls were noted.The returned device was found to be non-functional due to sheath damage.The basket sheath was severely buckled near the handle support sheath.The cause for the damage was unknown.Excessive force may have been inadvertently applied to the device, however no information was known regarding device handling, therefore the cause of the issue could not be conclusively determined.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook medical will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|