|
Model Number 283573 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Material Twisted/Bent (2981); Naturally Worn (2988)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/15/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by the sales rep that during a knee arthroscopy procedure on (b)(6) 2021, it was observed that the foot pedal(fms vue/nextra) device was broken.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: according to the information received, it was reported that during a knee arthroscopy while using a 5 way footpedal, reverse pedal was broken.The complaint device is not being returned, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.However, a photo was provided.Upon visual inspection of the photo, it was observed that signs of heavily use.One pedal was broken.As a potential cause cannot be associated to manufacturing, therefore a manufacturing record evaluation is not required.The photo do not provide enough evidence to determine root cause.Hands on analysis should provide the evidence necessary to confirm the root cause.The root cause could be attribute to the heavy use or by a fall it could have been damaged.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.As per ifu inspect all equipment and cables periodically for wear.If damage is noted, replace or return.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitkek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: according to the information received, it was reported that two of the vapr 3 footswitch could not be plugged to the main unit.The product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received.Visual observation showed marks of wear.The reverse pedal was broken, and it was not returned; therefore, this complaint can be confirmed.As a potential cause cannot be associated to manufacturing, therefore a manufacturing record evaluation is not required.The root cause of the damage in the pedal can be attributed to a drop of the unit as well as rough use.However, this cannot be conclusively affirmed.As per ifu inspect all equipment and cables periodically for wear.If damage is noted, replace or return.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|