H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a damaged midline catheter was confirmed.The product returned for evaluation was one 20ga x 10cm powerglide pro midline catheter assembly.Usage residues were observed throughout the sample.The guidewire was advanced and exhibited a sharp bend at the exit site from the needle tip.The guidewire was intact.The catheter was withdrawn and the needle had punctured the catheter approximately midway along its length.Microscopic inspection of the perforation in the catheter wall revealed a glossy fracture surface.The fracture was diagonally aligned.Inspection of the catheter tip revealed deformation.The catheter fracture features and position were consistent with perforation by the tip of the guidewire needle.The guidewire and catheter tip deformation were consistent with attempted insertion against resistance.It appeared that initial device placement was attempted against resistance.Subsequent withdrawal of the catheter back onto the needle resulted in the catheter shaft being pierced by the needle tip.
|