C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERLOC MAX POWER-INJECTIBLE INFUSION SET 20G X 0.75IN; SET, ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number N/A |
Device Problems
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/26/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.Device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that two days post port device placement, the tubing of the device allegedly broke.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported "port tubing breaking." addition information received stated: "patients' father called rn into the room, rn observed about 12 droplets of blood on and underneath the patient originating from the port central line.Rn immediately clamped the tubing in two places and stopped the chemotherapy that was infusing, rn observed that the port side, distal end of tubing was broken and blood was back flowing from the port site into the tubing onto the bed.Rn de-accessed the patient, unable to instill heparin due to break in the line and within 3 minutes of de-access, rn had re-accessed the patient successfully.Doc was notified that no more than 12 drops of chemo were assumed to be lost and that the chemo was back up and running after a 20 minutes delay.No notification was necessary from provider and family is content with their care at this time.".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a damaged infusion set was confirmed.The product returned for evaluation was one 20ga x 0.75¿ powerloc max safety infusion set.Usage residues were observed throughout the sample.A needleless injection cap was attached to the luer adapter and the safety mechanism was engaged.A partially circumferential split was observed at the luer/tubing joint.Microscopic inspection of the split revealed a granular fracture surface.Beach marks and radiating tear marks were observed throughout the fracture surface.Material buckling and discoloration were observed in the vicinity of the split.The split characteristics and material buckling were consistent with material failure due to repetitive stress.It appeared that the tubing fractured, in part, due to repetitive torsional (twisting) stress; however, an additional unidentified factor(s) also have contributed.The supplier has been notified of this event.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.H3 other text : evaluation findings are in section h.11.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|