• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION ENSEMBLE II DELIVERY SYSTEM; PULMONARY VALVE PROSTHESIS PERCUTANEOUSLY DELI

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION ENSEMBLE II DELIVERY SYSTEM; PULMONARY VALVE PROSTHESIS PERCUTANEOUSLY DELI Back to Search Results
Model Number ENS1022
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Failure to Advance (2524); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Vascular Dissection (3160); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
Event Date 11/02/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: the ensemble delivery catheter system (dcs) was discarded, therefore no product analysis can be performed.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during the implant of this transcatheter pulmonary bioprosthetic valve, it was reported that the delivery catheter system (dcs) was too big for the vessel.The dcs became kinked trying to advance through the curve into the right ventricular outflow tract (rvot).The valve was unable to be implanted.A vascular injury due to the small vessel was reported.The injury was treated with a covered stent.The procedure was aborted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received that a non-medtronic stent was placed to reduce/remove pulmonary valve stenosis prior to placing the valve.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received which reported that the vascular injury appeared to be a dissection.According to the physician, it is unknown whether the delivery catheter system (dcs) caused the injury or not as considerable pressure was applied.The physician believe that it was likely caused by the larger profile of the non-medtronic (dryseal) introducer sheath, however this was not definitively confirmed.According to the physician, it is unlikely that the dcs system got that high into the vein.It was reported that this patient was very small in stature, which contributed to the advancement difficulties.It was reported that the kink to the dcs occurred just behind the nosecone, so when the implanting physician advanced the dcs, it buckled and would not advance.The implanting physician was able to advance the dcs past the initial turn, however there was a second curve reported that the dcs could not traverse.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.Updated b5.Updated h6.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENSEMBLE II DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
PULMONARY VALVE PROSTHESIS PERCUTANEOUSLY DELI
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708734
MDR Report Key12828444
MDR Text Key280881684
Report Number2025587-2021-03465
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPV
UDI-Device Identifier00643169713901
UDI-Public00643169713901
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140017
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/30/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/17/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2023
Device Model NumberENS1022
Device Catalogue NumberENS1022
Device Lot NumberENS-0309
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/22/2021
Date Device Manufactured04/30/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age15 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight25 KG
-
-