• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 ECHELON; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 ECHELON; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK-NV-ECHELON
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Vasoconstriction (2126); Dysphasia (2195); Hydrocephalus (3272)
Event Date 04/26/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported patient age ((b)(6) years) indicates the mean age of patients included in the endovascular embolization treatment group reported in the article.Reported patient age (male) indicates the majority of patients included in the endovascular embolization treatment group reported in the article.Related medtronic ancillary device: axium coils - a separate report submitted.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Kang hu, genping cai, liang fu, lili huang, wei huang, wenhao wang, changchun liu.(2021).Effects of surgical clipping and endovascular embolization on the recovery of oculomotor nerve paralysis caused by posterior communicating artery aneurysm.Neurology asia, 26(3), 471¿478.Https://doi.Org/10.54029/2021vnw.Abstract background and objectives: our study aimed to explore the therapeutic effects of surgical clipping and endovascular embolization on the recovery of oculomotor nerve paralysis (onp) caused by posterior communicating artery aneurysm (pcomaa).Methods: the clinical data of patients with intracranial pcomaa and onp were retrospectively analyzed.All patients were treated with surgical clipping or endovascular embolization, then followed up for no less than 12 months.Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the potential risk factors influencing onp recovery.Results: among 128 patients of onp caused by pcomaa, 96 patients were treated with surgical clipping and 32 patients with endovascular embolization, respectively.Time from initial onp onset to complete or partial recovery was 85.3 ± 36.8 days for patients receiving surgical clipping, and 135.7 ± 41.3 days for patients treated with endovascular embolization.The recovery rate was 94 (97.9%) in the surgical clipping group and 22 (68.8%) in the endovascular embolization group, and significant difference was shown between the two groups (p 0.001).Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that the complete or partial recovery of onp in the surgical clipping group was significantly better than that in the endovascular embolization group (or, 5.582; 95%ci,.023-15.405; p 0.001).Moreover, time from initial symptom onset to receiving treatment also affect onp recovery (or, 0.893; 95% ci, 0.820-0.972; p = 0.009).Conclusion: surgical clipping was superior to endovascular embolization in the recovery of onp caused by pcomaa, and patients who received early intervention could result in better onp recovery.Medtronic review of the literature article found that the 32 patients who were treated with endovascular embolization were treated with axium coils delivered through echelon microcatheters.Those with wide neck aneurysms additionally had a solitaire stent placed; however, these cases were not specified in the article.Those treated with surgical clipping were not treated with a medtronic device.All patients treated had pre-existing oculomotor nerve paralysis (onp) caused by posterior communicating artery aneurysm (pcomaa).The average age of the endovascular embolization group was 52 years and the majority of patients (53.1%) were male.The article reviewed patient recovery from pre-existing onp symptoms as well other post-operative adverse events.10 patients did not have resolution of onp symptoms and 12 had only partial recovery.Serious post-operative adverse events described include: 6 patients had post-operative hydrocephalus.For 5 of these patients, no additional treatment was described.However 1 patient required ventriculo-peritoneal shunt placement after multiple lumbar punctures to release the blood cerebrospinal fluid.1 patient who had significant cerebral vasospasm.1 patient had developed aphasia.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported that there had never been an adverse event related to medtronic products that affected the success or failure of the operation.Axium coils, echelon microcatheters, and solitaire stents were routinely used for aneurysm interventional surgery in this hospital.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ECHELON
Type of Device
CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key12835995
MDR Text Key286144997
Report Number2029214-2021-01497
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/15/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/18/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNK-NV-ECHELON
Device Catalogue NumberUNK-NV-ECHELON
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/23/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Disability;
Patient Age52 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-