Catalog Number PFSR101209 |
Device Problem
Overheating of Device (1437)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/24/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The anspach emax 2 plus hand piece - rohs, used for treatment, was returned for evaluation.A relationship between the reported event and the device was established.The reported problem could not be visually confirmed.A functional evaluation was performed: the reported problem "does not hold the long attachment securely" was not confirmed.The customer drill was able to properly engage with a long attachment without issue.In regards to the allegation of motor not working during a case, the failure was not experienced.The drill, however, was not operating smoothly during the case or during the drill test, and was running hotter-than-expected in both cases.It is probable that on the field, the motor was run to the point where it stopped functioning during the case.Therefore, the problem will be confirmed, with probable cause being motor component failure.A review of manufacturing and service records indicate the device met all specifications upon release into distribution.A complaint history review for similar reported/confirmed complaints has identified prior events.Although no further containment or corrective action is recommended or required at this time, all complaints are monitored and trended through post market surveillance activities.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that upon bone removal during a navio assisted uka surgery, the anspach emax 2 plus hand piece - rohs would not spin.All connections and assembly were checked.The collar locking mechanism on the drill is loose and does not hold the long attachment securely.The procedure was finished with a smith and nephew back up device without significant delays.The patient was not harmed.The investigation found that the drill was hotter-than-expected during the drill test and the burring stage.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3, h6: the anspach emax 2 plus hand piece - rohs, part number pfsr101209, serial (b)(6) and used for treatment, was returned for evaluation.A relationship between the reported event and the device was established.The reported problem could not be visually confirmed.A functional evaluation was performed: the reported problem "does not hold the long attachment securely" was not confirmed.The customer drill was able to properly engage with a long attachment without issue.In regards to the allegation of motor not working during a case, the failure was not experienced.The drill, however, was not operating smoothly during the case or during the drill test, and was running hotter-than-expected in both cases.It is probable that the in the field, the motor was run to the point where it stopped functioning during the case.Therefore, the problem will be confirmed, with probable cause being motor component failure.A review of manufacturing and service records indicate the device met all specifications upon release into distribution.A complaint history review for similar reported/confirmed complaints has identified prior events.A historical capa, hhe/pra, field action review was completed.A review of prior escalation actions found no actions applicable to the scope of this case.This failure is an identified failure mode within the risk assessment.Although no further containment or corrective action is recommended or required at this time, all complaints are monitored and trended through post market surveillance activities.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|