• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON CARIBE LTD. BD BACTEC¿ PLUS AEROBIC/F CULTURE VIALS (PLASTIC); SYSTEM, BLOOD CULTURING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON CARIBE LTD. BD BACTEC¿ PLUS AEROBIC/F CULTURE VIALS (PLASTIC); SYSTEM, BLOOD CULTURING Back to Search Results
Model Number 442023
Device Problem False Positive Result (1227)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/24/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medical device expiration date: unknown.A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.Device manufacture date: unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while testing with bd bactec¿ plus aerobic/f culture vials (plastic) a false gram negative result was obtained.Confirmatory culture showed no gram-negative growth.There was no reported patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: (2 of 2) customer reporting bcid eplex- gp testing on 442023 bottles resulted gram negative but no gram negative grew in culture.Patient #6 *please provide the date this patient was tested on the bcid eplex gp: (b)(6) 2021 and (b)(6) 2021.*was eplex result dual positive? yes.-bcid eplex-gp resulted as staphylococcus and pan-gn both times *time to positivity? 30 hours 39 minutes *was any organism seen on the gram stain for this bottle? customer unable to provide *was the bottle plated to media? if so what type? blood, chocolate and mac *did any organism grow in culture? coag neg staph.No gram negative growth *you state for this patient the organism was not reported out, correct? customer did not provide.They just provided that no adverse events were reported.*can you provide the serial number of the bactec the bottle was in when it went positive? the rack? the drawer? customer unable to provide.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H6: investigation summary : customer reported a positive id result for bactec media, while using genmark bcid eplex.Investigation cannot be conducted to the retention samples since the lot number is unknown.A complaint history review cannot be conducted relating to the incident lot number and the ¿as reported¿ defect code since batch number is unknown.Complaints for catalog reported have been received.The batch history record could not be reviewed as the lot number is unknown nonetheless batch history records are always reviewed prior to product release.Complaint is unconfirmed.Customer complaints for molecular false positive have been received but as per product insert a gram-stained smear from culture medium may contain small numbers of nonviable organisms derived from media constituents, staining reagents, immersion oil, glass slides, and specimens used for inoculation.Due to the nature of biological materials in media products and inherent organism variability, the user should be cognizant of potential variable results in the recovery of certain microorganisms.Molecular tests performed on positive blood cultures will detect both viable and non-viable organisms commonly found in culture media.Therefore, molecular test results should be evaluated in conjunction with gram stain results in accordance with standard-of-care practices as well as manufacturer¿s instructions for use.No corrective nor further actions were required.A cross functional team continually monitors all product complaints for trends and determines if any additional actions are necessary beyond the current investigational process.H3 other text : see h10.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while testing with bd bactec¿ plus aerobic/f culture vials (plastic) a false gram negative result was obtained.Confirmatory culture showed no gram-negative growth.There was no reported patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: (2 of 2).Customer reporting bcid eplex- gp testing on 442023 bottles resulted gram negative but no gram negative grew in culture.Patient #6.Please provide the date this patient was tested on the bcid eplex gp: (b)(6) 2021 and (b)(6) 2021.Was eplex result dual positive? yes.Bcid eplex-gp resulted as staphylococcus and pan-gn both times time to positivity? 30 hours 39 minutes was any organism seen on the gram stain for this bottle? customer unable to provide was the bottle plated to media? if so what type? blood, chocolate and mac did any organism grow in culture? coag neg staph.No gram negative growth you state for this patient the organism was not reported out, correct? customer did not provide.They just provided that no adverse events were reported.Can you provide the serial number of the bactec the bottle was in when it went positive? the rack? the drawer? customer unable to provide.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD BACTEC¿ PLUS AEROBIC/F CULTURE VIALS (PLASTIC)
Type of Device
SYSTEM, BLOOD CULTURING
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON CARIBE LTD.
vicks drive
lot no. 6
cayey PR
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON DICKINSON CARIBE LTD.
vicks drive
lot no. 6
cayey PR
Manufacturer Contact
katie swenson
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key12928847
MDR Text Key286510970
Report Number2647876-2021-00325
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MDB
UDI-Device Identifier00382904420239
UDI-Public00382904420239
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K113558
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/17/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/03/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model Number442023
Device Catalogue Number442023
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/17/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-