• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CORPORATION OPTEASE RETR FILTER 55; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CORPORATION OPTEASE RETR FILTER 55; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number 466F210A
Device Problems Difficult to Insert (1316); Material Puncture/Hole (1504)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/26/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with this lot presented no issues during the manufacturing process that can be related to the reported complaint.It is unknown if the device will be returned for testing and evaluation.   additional information is pending and will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
 
Event Description
As reported, in the process of conveying the optease retrievable 55 filter, the outer sheath was pierced, and the filter could not be pushed.There was no patient injury.A 5f cordis femoral artery sheath angiography and 6f sheath that comes with the product were used.The indication for filter insertion was deep vein thrombosis of lower extremities.The device was prepped per the instructions for use (ifu).There was no difficulty experienced in prepping the device.The device did not kink nor bend at any time.The other devices used with the product did not kink nor bend at any time.The product, or any of the other devices used with it, had not been resterilized.The insertion difficulty was not caused by a blockage of possibly injectable material.The procedure was completed by resetting the sheath and using a new filter.The product is expected to be returned for evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for analysis but the engineering report is not yet available.However, it will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.Additional information is pending and will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint conclusion: as reported, in the process of conveying the optease retrievable 55 filter, the outer sheath was pierced, and the filter could not be pushed.There was no patient injury.A 5f cordis femoral artery sheath angiography and 6f sheath that comes with the product were used.The indication for filter insertion was deep vein thrombosis of lower extremities.The device was prepped per the instructions for use (ifu).There was no difficulty experienced in prepping the device.The device did not kink nor bend at any time.The other devices used with the product did not kink nor bend at any time.The product, or any of the other devices used with it, had not been resterilized.The insertion difficulty was not caused by a blockage of possibly injectable material.The procedure was completed by resetting the sheath and using a new filter.The device was returned for evaluation.A non-sterile optease retr filter 55 cannula sheath with a retrievable filter inside, were received for analysis in a plastic bag.Per visual analysis, the filter was returned with the filter barbs protruding through the cannula sheath.Also, kinks were observed in the cannula sheath body near the stuck filter.No other anomalies could be observed by the naked eye.Per functional analysis, an attempt to pass the filter through the csi cannula sheath was performed.Despite the kinks on the cannula sheath, a lab sample obturator was introduced into the cannula sheath up to the filter in order to push the filter.However, the filter could not be advanced forward due to the filter barb protruding the cannula sheath wall.Therefore, a lab sample obturator was introduced into the cannula sheath at the distal tip, and the filter was moved backward to liberate it from its stuck position, and then, pushed forth once again.This time, the filter was able to be pushed all the way through and out of the sheath.Besides the kinks in the cannula sheath and the filter barb perforating the sheath, no other anomalies found.Per microscopic analysis, the cannula sheath kinked, and perforated area was inspected under the vision system.Amplified images of the cannula sheath were taken for a better observation of the sheath perforated condition.The type of damage observed on the cannula is that of damages commonly caused during the interaction of the cannula material with a sharp object or mechanical damage.In this case, the barbs of the filter caused the perforated condition found on the cannula sheath.Additionally, the filter barbs were also inspected under the vision system and no anomalies were found.A product history review of lot 17988678 revealed no anomalies during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be considered potentially related to the reported complaint.The reported ¿filter ¿ impeded - perforated sheath¿ was confirmed during analysis of the returned device.The exact cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined, however review of the analysis and the available information suggests procedural and/or handling factors, such as operator technique leading to kinking of the sheath, that may have contributed to the reported event.The filter/ filter barbs were inspected under the vision system and no anomalies were found.According to the instructions for use (ifu) which is not intended as a mitigation of risk, ¿if strong resistance is met during any stage of the procedure, discontinue the procedure and determine the cause before proceeding.¿ neither the phr, product analysis, nor the information available suggests a design or manufacturing related cause for the reported event; therefore, no corrective/preventive action will be taken at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OPTEASE RETR FILTER 55
Type of Device
FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes FL 33014
Manufacturer (Section G)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes FL 33014
Manufacturer Contact
karla castro
14201 nw 60 avenue
miami lakes, FL 33014
7863138372
MDR Report Key13052786
MDR Text Key284524816
Report Number9616099-2021-05217
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
UDI-Device Identifier20705032009390
UDI-Public(01)20705032009390(17)231130(10)17988678
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K034050
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/24/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/21/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2023
Device Model Number466F210A
Device Catalogue Number466F210A
Device Lot Number17988678
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/20/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/05/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/02/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight65 KG
Patient RaceAsian
-
-