Model Number 22438-19 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Insert (1316); Material Separation (1562); Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/11/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the emboshield nav 6 embolic protection system (eps) filtration element could not be loaded into the delivery catheter (dc) pod.The torque device was used.Upon removal of the filtration element, it was noted that there was some wrinkling observed on the dc pod.There was no reported device use or patient involvement.There was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.Returned device analysis identified the delivery catheter pod was separated 13.5mm distal to the marker.The separated portion of the dc pod was not returned.Communication with the account confirmed the tip separated during preparation and was discarded.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was returned for analysis which identified the delivery catheter pod was separated 13.5mm distal to the marker.The reported difficult to insert was unable to be replicated in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.The reported material separation was able to be confirmed.The reported material twisted / bent dc pod was unable to be confirmed/tested as the dc pod was not returned.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.As there was no damage noted to the device during the inspection prior to use, the investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely that the filter was pulled into the pod too quickly and/or with excessive force resulting in the reported wrinkled dc pod; thus resulting in the reported difficult to insert.Manipulation of the device resulted in the noted device damages (stretched/offset barewire coils, multiple kink/bent barewire core) and ultimately resulted in the reported/noted material separation.The noted kink on the delivery catheter likely occurred due to handling or during packing for return analysis.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was returned for analysis which identified the delivery catheter pod was separated 13.5mm distal to the marker.The reported difficult to insert was unable to be replicated in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.The reported material separation was able to be confirmed.The reported material twisted / bent dc pod was unable to be confirmed/tested as the dc pod was not returned.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.As there was no damage noted to the device during the inspection prior to use, the investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely that the filter was pulled into the pod too quickly and/or with excessive force resulting in the reported wrinkled dc pod; thus resulting in the reported difficult to insert.Manipulation of the device resulted in the noted device damages (stretched/offset barewire coils, multiple kink/bent barewire core) and ultimately resulted in the reported/noted material separation.The noted kink on the delivery catheter likely occurred due to handling or during packing for return analysis.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the emboshield nav 6 embolic protection system (eps) filtration element could not be loaded into the delivery catheter (dc) pod.The torque device was used.Upon removal of the filtration element, it was noted that there was some wrinkling observed on the dc pod.There was no reported device use or patient involvement.There was no reported clinically significant delay in the procedure.Returned device analysis identified the delivery catheter pod was separated 13.5mm distal to the marker.The separated portion of the dc pod was not returned.Communication with the account confirmed the tip separated during preparation and was discarded.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|