C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 1806060J |
Device Problems
Fracture (1260); Material Separation (1562); Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
|
Event Date 11/30/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.The catalog number identified has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the powerport isp m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, 6f that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the powerport isp m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, 6f are identified.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately one and a half years post port placement, ct examination was performed and revealed that the catheter was broken near the cath lock.It was further reported that the distal catheter segment migrated.Port body and distal catheter segment were removed from the patient.The patient current status is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the powerport isp m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, 6f that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the powerport isp m.R.I.Implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, 6f are identified in d2 and g4.Manufacturing review: a device history record review could not be performed as the batch/lot number was not provided.Investigation summary: one powerport isp mri attached to a catheter in two segments was returned for evaluation.Gross visual, microscopic visual and functional evaluations were performed on the returned device.The investigation is confirmed for the reported catheter fracture issue as a distally migrating longitudinal split was noted at the proximal end of the distal catheter segment.The edges of the distally migrating longitudinal split was observed to be finely granular.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported catheter material separation and migration issue striations were noted on the complete circumferential break of catheter near the port stem and the exact circumstances at the time of the reported event is unknown.A definitive root cause for the reported failure could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately one and a half years post port placement, ct examination was performed and revealed that the catheter was broken near the cath lock.It was further reported that the distal catheter was allegedly migrated.Reportedly, the port body and distal catheter segment were removed from the patient.The patient current status is unknown.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|