Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Investigation summary: visual inspection: the 5.5 viper univ poly driver (part# 279734000n, lot# gm4222402 qty# 1) was returned and received at us cq.Upon visual inspection, it is observed that the distal tip of the driver shaft sub-assembly has broken off.The broken fragment was not returned.No issues were noted with the sleeve sub-assembly.Device failure/defect identified? yes.Dimensional inspection: dimensional inspection of the relevant feature of the received device was not performed at cq due to post manufacturing damage.Document/specification review: no design issues or discrepancies were found during this investigation.Complaint confirmed? yes.Investigation conclusion: the complaint is being confirmed for the 5.5 viper univ poly driver (part# 279734000n, lot# gm4222402 qty# 1) as the distal tip of the driver shaft was broken.A definitive root cause could not be identified for the reported issue from the available information.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.No design issues were observed during the document/specification review.Based upon these results, no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: a review of the receiving inspection (ri) for 5.5 viper univ poly driver was conducted identifying that lot number gm4222402 was released in a two (2) batches.Batch1: lot was released on jan 20, 2015 with no discrepancies.Batch2: lot was released on mar 10, 2015 with no discrepancies.As a result, the ri identified no issues during the manufacturing and release of this device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.Device history review: the ri identified no issues during the manufacturing and release of this device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|