This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.Investigation results are available 1.Event description: it was reported that the patient was revised due to a broken ncb proximal tibia plate.Harm: s3 - bone malunion/non-union, resulting in revision or other interventions hazardous situation: implant deteriorates, breaks or loses function postoperatively.2.Review of received data: due diligence: no further due diligence required as all required information to support the conclusion is available or was already requested.X-rays: the provided x-rays were reviewed by a health care professional; however they were not sent for further evaluation as the surgical reports provided sufficient findings.Surgical report: review of the surgical report dated (b)(6) 2021 found the patient was implanted with a ncb proximal periprosthetic fracture plate for a femur fracture.There were no noted abnormalities during the procedure.Review of the surgical report dated (b)(6) 2021 found that the patient was being revised due to a fracture of the plate and the absence of healing.One screw from the initial plate was firmly in the femur and was left in vivo during the revision.A new plate was placed after fracture reduction of the bone.3.Product evaluation: visual examination: the broken ncb pp plate and sub components were returned for investigation.The plate was broken into two fragments.The fracture of the plate is located through the middle screw hole of a three hole pattern.On the fracture surfaces, beach lines are visible which point to a fatigue fracture.The fracture surfaces shows also small polished areas and some scratches, most probably due to contact between the parts after the fracture.Several scratches are visible on the surface of the non-bone-facing side of the plate.In addition, a broken screw head is returned.The other screws and locking caps do not show any damages or deformations.4.Review of product documentation: device purpose: all involved devices are intended for treatment.Product compatibility: the product combination was approved by zimmer biomet dhr review: review of the device history records identified no deviations or anomalies during manufacturing.Raw material certificate: the raw material certificate was reviewed with no anomalies noted.5.Conclusion: it was reported that the patient had a revision surgery due to a ncb pp plate fracture.The plate was in vivo for 1.5 months.The quality records show that all specified characteristics (material, dimensions, surface, etc.) for the ncb pp plate have met the specifications valid at the time of production.Therefore, the investigation results did not identify a non-conformance or a complaint out of box (coob).The visual examination of the plate indicates a fatigue fracture.Microscopically, no defects can be observed that could trigger or contribute to the fracture.Fatigue fractures can occur due to a cyclic overloading.Possible contributing factors to the overload could be a not properly healed bone fracture and / or not adherence to the postoperative protocol (patient behavior).However, based on the available information and performed investigation, an exact root cause for the plate breakage could not be determined if any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.Zimmer biomet's reference for this event is: (b)(4).
|