• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAZOR ROBOTICS LTD MAZOR X SYSTEM; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAZOR ROBOTICS LTD MAZOR X SYSTEM; ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number TPL0059
Device Problem Imprecision (1307)
Patient Problem Nerve Damage (1979)
Event Date 12/24/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information regarding a guidance system being used during a spinal procedure.It was reported that there were deviations during a scoliosis correction procedure from t4-l3.The left side of the patient was noted to be concave.The first segment was from t10-l3 and a disposable clamp was placed on the l1 spinous process.There was a medial breach at left l2.The deviation was confirmed with an o-arm scan and the patient's mep signals dropped significantly over time after facetectomies were done.The surgeon believed the segment became movable and the medial screw brushed against the spinal cord causing the drop in motor responses.The screw was removed.The surface of the bone was flattened prior to placing the screw.On the right side, there was soft tissue pressure on the l2 and l3 trajectories that resulted in the surgeon free handing those trajectories.The second segment was from t4-t9 and a dual clamp was placed at t6 and t7.Only one portion of the clamp was used and the other part was loose.All screws were placed accurately on the left side, but there t4-t5 trajectories looked medial.The surgeon decided to freehand t4 and t5 right.The cause of the deviations was not determined.The trajectories were deviated less than 3.5 mm.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3: analysis of the software exports and logs found the complaint was confirmed.Clinical export data file was thoroughly inspected.The log file was examined with respect to all intraoperative fluoro images in order to inspect and understand procedure workflow.Analysis reviewed the planning made for the case.L2 bilateral, l3 right and t4 right were planned with high axial angles (>12 degrees).No post op images were provided to confirm the reported deviations, however the analysis examined the 3d reconstruction of the scan & plan study provided.The planned l2, l3 right and t4-t5 right trajectories can be seen in proximity to the incision edges, hence are subjected to soft tissue pressure, which may create difficulties to accommodate the tools without deviating them medially.As reported, the deviations of l2 bilateral, l3 right, t4 and t5 right were medial.Considering the accurate trajectories done in between, platform shift as a root cause seems to be eliminated.Based on all available information, after ruling out a platform shift, considering the open approach and the high angles in the planning, analysis concluded the root cause of the deviation experienced in the or was soft-tissue pressure applied on the tools while instrumenting, resulted in medially deviated l2 bilateral, l3 right, t4 right and t5 right trajectories.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAZOR X SYSTEM
Type of Device
ORTHOPEDIC STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAZOR ROBOTICS LTD
5 shacham street
p.o. box 3104
caesarea hefa,il 30795 67
IS  3079567
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAZOR ROBOTICS LTD
5 shacham street
p.o. box 3104
caesarea hefa,il 30795 67
IS   3079567
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key13231457
MDR Text Key287592390
Report Number3005075696-2022-00003
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OLO
UDI-Device Identifier07290109183213
UDI-Public07290109183213
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
K182077
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/30/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/11/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberTPL0059
Device Catalogue NumberTPL0059
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/28/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/16/2019
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-