Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The device was returned for evaluation.During repair, an evaluation was performed and it was determined that the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause was traced to component failure due to normal wear.Reporter number extension (b)(4).Udi: (b)(4).
|
It was reported from russia that during service and evaluation, it was determined that the air reamer device had component damage, the etching was illegible, the moving parts did not move smoothly, made excessive noise, low power, was leaking air and was worn.It was further determined that the device failed pretest for general condition, marking & labeling, check for mechanical free movement, check for noticeable noise, check power with power test bench and check for air leak.It was noted in the service order that the device did not work.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|