• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. PRINEO SKIN CLOSURE SYSTEM UNKNOWN PRODUCT; SURGICAL SEALANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. PRINEO SKIN CLOSURE SYSTEM UNKNOWN PRODUCT; SURGICAL SEALANT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 01/01/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported via journal article: title: to assess whether 2-octyl cyanoacrylate skin adhesive (dermabondtm topical skin adhesive, ethicon) is the ideal wound closure technique in cardiac surgery limiting surgical site infection the aim of our study is to evaluate the effects of the topical skin adhesive 2-octyl cyanoacrylate prineo (dermabondtm topical skin adhesive, ethicon), used as the final layer in sternotomy closure in patients undergoing cardiac surgery on the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection.Between january 1st 2015 to december 31st 2018, a total of 1604 divided into two groups by virtue of the type of wound closure technique.Group 1 n=840 (2-octyl cyanoacrylate skin adhesive(prineo) ; group 2 n=764 (staples/steristrip under opsite dressing).The mean age was (b)(6).Both groups were homogeneous in terms of the risk factors of mediastinis : diabetes mellitis (requiring insuline), obesity (bmi>30), smoking, renal impairment, length of surgery, mean age and sex.The rate of 551 was found lower in group 1 (closure with dermabond prineo), 1,90 %, compared to the other group, 4,19%.Group 1 was also superior in terms of lower length of hospital stay.Furthermore, the subsequent decline in 551 after 2017, since the adoption of prineo, has been highlighted by the observation made by swissnoso in their annual analysis of ssi.Reported postoperative complication in group 1 included n=? surgical site infection (ssi).In conclusion, dermabond adhesive has proved, in our practice, to be a safe wound closure treatment that provides an ideal healing environment with its antimicrobial protection, reducing considerably surgical site infection and helps to reduce the economic burden of current care (frequent dressing changes).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).As no contact information has been provided, no follow up can or will be performed at this time.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.This report is related to a journal article; therefore, no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.The single complaint was reported with multiple events.There are no additional details regarding the additional events.Citation: respiration: 2020; conference: ssc/sscs ssp/ssts joint annual meeting 2020.Davos switzerland, 99(8): 733.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRINEO SKIN CLOSURE SYSTEM UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
SURGICAL SEALANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
1000 route 202
raritan NJ 08869
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.-SAN LORENZO PR
road 183, km. 8.3
san lorenzo 00754
*   00754
Manufacturer Contact
elba bello
1000 route 202
raritan, NJ 08869
MDR Report Key13285925
MDR Text Key288984607
Report Number2210968-2022-00486
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OMD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
K082289
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/18/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/18/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/22/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-