The complainant stated that the surgeon observed interference between the edge device and the patient's cranial bone.The surgeon reportedly modified the edge fit according to the instructions for use provided.After modifying the fit the surgeon used cranial mesh to cover the resulting gap and complete the procedure.There was no report of harm to the patient as a result of this event.A review of device history record found that the device was manufactured as designed and as requested by the surgeon.Upon examination of the patient's ct scan provided to medcad, there was evidence of image artifacts suggesting patient movement during the scan.Medcad's published ct scan instructions specify that motion artifacts must be avoided as they can negatively impact the functioning of final device.The device history record indicated that the ct scan provided as input to medcad was reviewed and approved; however, the patient movement was not initially detected.
|