If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.A device history record (dhr) review was conducted: visual inspection: the depth gauge f/scr ø2+2.4 meas-range up-t was received for analysis.Upon visual inspection, it was observed the needle component of the device had broken off and included in package, confirming the complaint condition.Protection sleeve is missing.Dimensional inspection: a dimensional inspection was not performed due to the post manufacturing damage of the device.Investigation conclusion: this complaint is confirmed as the needle component of the complaint device had broken off.No definitive root cause could be determined based on the provided information.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: no ncr's were generated during production.Device history review: review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any sub-components, which would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|