A healthcare professional reported during an intraocular lens implant procedure, the haptic torn off during implantation and ruptured the posterior capsule.The lens was exchanged with another lens during the initial procedure.The patient was tested visual acuity of the order of 0.7, there is a slight swelling in the corneal zone, in the projection of the main access.Additional information has been requested.
|
The product was not returned for analysis.Photo provided shows fully activated intraocular lens (iol) device, no damage can be confirmed from the photo.Photo also shows iol on the iol case lid.The haptic is observed broken/ torn and is present in the photo.Based on our observation of the attached photo, haptic is broken/torn.A definitive determination of damage cannot be made without the evaluation of the physical product.A final root cause cannot be determined based on available information.Broken haptics may occur: ¿ due to the use of a non-qualified viscoelastic.Material properties of non-qualified ovds may contribute to underfill, overfill, misfolding of the haptics, or other inconsistent folding outcomes.¿ if the operating room temperature is too high (> 23°c / 73° f) lens folding consistency is negatively affected, the lens is more adherent and this may inhibit lens advancement.In addition, haptic strength (modulus) decreases as the temperature increases and is more likely to break under stress.¿ if a straight trailing haptic occurs and it was not properly detected to be out of position.¿ if the plunger is not fully advanced, the trailing haptic may not release properly from the device.Any of the above listed causes alone, or in combination, may create the reported event.Based on the results from the product history record, the products met release criteria.There are no other complaints for the reported lot.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|