A review of the device history record, which includes verification of all steps in the manufacturing of the us catheter revision kit, verification of all final testing performed by/on the us catheter kit, and packaging for subject us catheter kit was performed.The review did not identify any non-conformances, issues or capas associated with us catheter kit function.Device was discarded and not returned for additional evaluation and investigation.The physician reported that the cause of the catheter fracture was unknown.Per the instructions for use of the device, catheter fracture is a known possible risk of use of the device.Internal complaint number: (b)(4).
|
Information was received that confirmed that a catheter was revised due to volume discrepancies.The patient complained of increased pain at a refill appointment.At the same refill appointment, an underinfusion volume discrepancy was observed, with the expected volume being 3.8ml and the actual aspirated volume being 10ml.During the surgery, the catheter was found to be fractured.The physician did not know the cause of the catheter fracture.The original pump was replaced due to device age.No issues were noted with the pump.Both the original pump and revised catheter segment were discarded.
|