• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL TIBIAL NAIL, STANDARD T2 TIBIA Ø11X345 MM; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL TIBIAL NAIL, STANDARD T2 TIBIA Ø11X345 MM; ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES Back to Search Results
Model Number 1822-1134S
Device Problem Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem Discomfort (2330)
Event Date 11/12/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device will not be returned.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided in a supplemental report.Device is not available; device remains implanted in patient.
 
Event Description
As reported: "the nail was implanted on (b)(6) 2015.It is a stryker tibial nail t2 stryker, 345 mm, size 11.Postoperatively, the patient initially underwent partial weight-bearing for 2 weeks and then full weight-bearing depending on the degree of discomfort.The patient was followed up regularly by the surgeon in consultation.The metal removal took place on (b)(6) 2021.All locking pins were removed there - but the nail could not be taken out despite intensive efforts.The nail bothered the patient after 6 1/2 years and he wanted to have it removed.The nail could not be removed during the four-hour surgery, which upset the patient very much.The customer suspects that the nail bent in the lower part and therefore could not be removed.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could not be confirmed, since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other evidence was provided.The reported event indicated that the implants had fulfilled their tasks ¿ temporary stabilization of a bone fracture ¿ for a period of 6.5 year[s].The course of bone healing has not been provided and no indication is given that the patient has fallen.The reported event is about unsuccessful hardware removal, and no revision was carried out.As per ifu ¿the implant is intended for temporary bone fixation, if explantation is not carried out, complications may occur.¿ in many instances adverse effects are rather clinical than device related.Furthermore, it is pointed out as following ¿the surgeon must counsel each patient individually on correct behavior and activity after the implantation.¿ whether the patient was affected by any unusual changes and / or accidents in the implantation area was unknown.Medical records and x-ray images were requested but to no avail and thus, a medical statement was not possible.According to details available no deviation in contouring of the nail was reported at the time of nail implantation.Used counterparts for metal removal procedure [extraction tools] were unknown.The brochure "implant extraction set optech¿ offers guidance how to proceed during implant explantation and describes the handling with the different counterparts.With details given no discrepancies of the nail in question was verified and a further technical statement was impossible.More detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the exact root cause of the complaint event.A review of the device history was not possible because the lot number was not communicated.No corrective actions are required at this time.No hint of indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems could be verified based on current information available.In case substantive information will become available in future that suggests otherwise we reserve the right to reopen the case.
 
Event Description
As reported: "the nail was implanted on (b)(6) 2015.It is a stryker tibial nail t2 stryker, 345 mm, size 11.Postoperatively, the patient initially underwent partial weight-bearing for 2 weeks and then full weight-bearing depending on the degree of discomfort.The patient was followed up regularly by the surgeon in consultation.The metal removal took place on (b)(6) 2021.All locking pins were removed there but the nail could not be taken out despite intensive efforts.The nail bothered the patient after 6 1/2 years and he wanted to have it removed.The nail could not be removed during the four-hour surgery, which upset the patient very much.The customer suspects that the nail bent in the lower part and therefore could not be removed.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TIBIAL NAIL, STANDARD T2 TIBIA Ø11X345 MM
Type of Device
ROD, FIXATION, INTRAMEDULLARY AND ACCESSORIES
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-242 32
GM  D-24232
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER TRAUMA KIEL
prof. kuentscher-strasse 1-5
schoenkirchen/kiel D-242 32
GM   D-24232
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key13737018
MDR Text Key287033905
Report Number0009610622-2022-00089
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HSB
UDI-Device Identifier04546540198044
UDI-Public04546540198044
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSZ
PMA/PMN Number
K203819
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/19/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/11/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number1822-1134S
Device Catalogue Number18221134S
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/21/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age27 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-