• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MOOG INC. ELLIPS FX PHACO HANDPIECE; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MOOG INC. ELLIPS FX PHACO HANDPIECE; UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION Back to Search Results
Model Number 690880
Device Problem Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problems Corneal Abrasion (1789); Eye Injury (1845); Eye Burn (2523)
Event Date 03/01/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that patient claimed to have felt heat while sculpting a groove in a nucleus with ellips fx handpiece.The surgeon alleged he had heard slightly unusual noise from phaco machine before he sensed the heat from the handpiece.He immediately took the tip out from the patient's eye.The incision received mild thermal burn.The surgeon confirmed that the handpiece became hot when he stepped footpedal.He replaced with the phaco machine and equipment of another company¿s product, and the surgery was successfully completed with 10 minutes delay.The wound was normally closed, there was no suture.No further information provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional narrative information: age at time of event: unknown.Date of birth: unknown.Patient weight: unknown.Ethnicity and race: unknown.Expiration date: product does not expire.Concomitant medical products: ngp680300, ip / sleeve: opor1520l / opos20l.Device evaluation: sales rep visited customer site and checked the equipment.He was unable to duplicate the issue.There was no irrigation issue.There was no kink or occlusion in tubing lines.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: h6 type of investigation code 10 and investigation findings code 213 were included in the initial report.However, what was checked at the time of that report submission was the whitestar system which was a concomitant product and not the suspect product, the handpiece.The whitestar signature has its own report.Additional information: h6 type of investigation - code 10 h6 investigation findings code 213 field service performed check on the suspect product, the fx handpiece and it met all amo specifications.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing record review: a review of the device history record (dhr) showed, there was no discrepancies or non-conformances experienced during manufacturing.The system and its components met all specifications prior to being released.Device evaluation: a video of the event was submitted and evaluated by our subject matter experts (sme).It is observed the development of bubbles in the handpiece during the sculpting portion of the surgery, with withdrawal of the handpiece and development of a mild thermal burn to the incision site.The reported event can be confirmed; however, it is not possible to speculate the root cause of the incident through observation of the video provided.Some potential root causes could include (but not limited to): 1) rapid heat-up of the hp typically comes from 5 potential sources: a.Obstruction in the irrigation pathway combined with higher phaco power % settings and higher/continuous duty cycle settings b.Obstruction in the aspiration pathway combined with higher phaco power % settings and higher/continuous duty cycle settings c.Phaco power % settings and/or duty cycle settings inadvertently changed to higher values d.Electronic circuit failure in the console e.Electronic circuit failure in phaco hp body or phaco hp cable 2) typically, the hub and shaft of the phaco tip heat-up much more rapidly than the higher thermal mass of the phaco hp.Since it was reported that the handpiece heated up very quickly, there is a higher probability that the fluid flow was occluded either up-stream or downstream of the phaco tip.Conclusion: based on the investigation results there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ELLIPS FX PHACO HANDPIECE
Type of Device
UNIT, PHACOFRAGMENTATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MOOG INC.
2268 south 3270 west
salt lake city UT 84119
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key13925941
MDR Text Key288016246
Report Number3012236936-2022-00763
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQC
UDI-Device Identifier05050474537132
UDI-Public(01)05050474537132(17)991231(10)E229368
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K981116
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/23/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/28/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number690880
Device Catalogue Number690880
Device Lot NumberE229368
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/26/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/06/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-