The device was not returned.The reported event could not be confirmed, since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other evidences were provided.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.More detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.If the device is returned or any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.H3 other text : device disposition is unknown.
|
Correction: please refer to d9/h3-the product was returned, h6 component, method, results & conclusion codes.The reported event could be confirmed, since the device was returned for evaluation and matches the alleged failure mode.The device inspection revealed the following: the received screw was found to be broken from the mid-shaft region.A few threads were found to be deformed around the nail contact region, indicating towards a high compressive load.The fracture pattern resembles a fatigue fracture evident by the shiny and clean surface and partial lines of rest on the initial part due to high cyclic loading.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.An x-ray was provided which was presented to our health care professional for evaluation, and a question about the most likely reason for the breakage was asked, to which the medical expert replied: ¿in this case, it would be helpful to have a further x-ray showing the fracture site as well.It is likely that the breakage occurred due to some self-dynamization of the nail because of persisting fracture gap after the insertion of the nail, but that can only be said with confidence with the x-ray.¿ [original statement(s)] based on the above investigation and available information, the root cause of the failure is deemed to be more likely patient-related.The early breakage and deformed thread indicate towards overloading of the screw.The overloading is most likely due to the excessive weight of the patient as indicated in the details.If any additional information is received, the record will be updated.
|