• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC CROSSCATH SUPPORT CATHETER; KRA CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC CROSSCATH SUPPORT CATHETER; KRA CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH Back to Search Results
Model Number G51577
Device Problems Break (1069); Peeled/Delaminated (1454)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/22/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
As reported, a crosscath support catheter delaminated.The device was attempted to be advanced over a 0.018" wire guide but could not due to resistance.The catheter bunched, and a fragment separated from the catheter when removing from the wire.The device did not make patient contact.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device has been returned and preliminary evaluation has been performed, however, our investigation is ongoing and device evaluation summary will be included in our follow up report once our investigation has been completed.Corrected information: h6 (annex a) this report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
Additional information received 07apr2022.Resistance was encountered while attempting to advance the catheter over a wire guide, and the catheter then accordioned.Per the reporter, the device was not advanced far enough to reach the patient.The user attempted to remove the catheter from the wire with force; the catheter elongated and was not smooth.Per the reporter, the catheter did not separate; however, upon return and initial evaluation of the device, the catheter had separated into two sections.
 
Event Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Event summary: the device was attempted to be advanced over a 0.018" wire guide but could not due to resistance.The catheter bunched, and a fragment separated from the catheter when removing from the wire.The device did not make patient contact.Resistance was encountered while attempting to advance the catheter over a wire guide, and the catheter then accordioned.Per the reporter, the device was not advanced far enough to reach the patient.The user attempted to remove the catheter from the wire with force; the catheter elongated and was not smooth.Per the reporter, the catheter did not separate; however, upon return and initial evaluation of the device, the catheter had separated into two sections.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation ¿ evaluation.A visual inspection dimensional verification of the returned device was conducted.A document-based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record (dhr), drawing, the instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, and quality control data.The complainant retuned one crosscath support catheter to cook for investigation.Physical examination of the returned device found that it was separated 140.3 cm from the strain relief and had evidence of stretching and elongation.The separated piece measured 44 cm in length and also exhibited stretch damage and was twisted.3 marker bands were visible.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other related complaints from the lot have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: precautions: this product is intended for use by physicians trained and experienced in small vessel access and interventional procedures.Standard techniques for placement of percutaneous catheters should be employed.The catheter should not be advanced through an area of resistance unless the source of resistance is identified by fluoroscopy and appropriate step are taken to reduce or remove the obstruction.Do not advance catheter without the wire extending out of the distal tip.This catheter should only be used by physicians qualified to perform percutaneous vascular interventions.How supplied: upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.Cook concluded that conditions related to the procedure were the cause of this incident.The customer stated that the user of the device was a trainee.The resistance encountered during removal likely caused the user to apply excessive force, leading to the separation of the catheter.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook medical will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CROSSCATH SUPPORT CATHETER
Type of Device
KRA CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8128294891
MDR Report Key13967422
MDR Text Key288504293
Report Number1820334-2022-00502
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRA
UDI-Device Identifier00827002515772
UDI-Public(01)00827002515772(17)240628(10)14054856
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K161801
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/27/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/31/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberG51577
Device Catalogue NumberCXC3.4-2.2-18-150-P-NS-0
Device Lot Number14054856
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/16/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/28/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC V18 WIRE
-
-