• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, MITRAL VALVE, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, MITRAL VALVE, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9610TF26U
Device Problems Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 03/10/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Edwards received notification from our affiliate in germany.As reported, this was a valve-in-valve case of an implant of a 26mm edwards sapien 3 ultra transcatheter heart valve, in mitral position by transseptal approach, into a non-edwards.During procedure, there were a few problems with the procedure, but it was able to solve them all in the end.The initial problem was that it was not able to pass the septum with the sapien 3 ultra 26mm, even though it was pre-dilated it with a 12mm balloon.As a result, the stiff wire partial embolized to the left atrium.In the end the valve catheter was removed with the prosthesis.Therefore, a new catheter and valve was prepared and implanted successfully.There was no injury to the patient reported.Due to the massive manipulation that had been required the crossing maneuvers attempts, it was noticed that the balloon was damaged with anticipated partial rupture of the balloon and the valve did not look good outside the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is in progress.A supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a no product return engineering evaluation was performed.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaints of difficulty crossing the septal wall with the delivery system and balloon leak were unable to be confirmed as the device was not returned and no applicable imagery was provided.Due to the unavailability of the device, engineering was unable to perform any visual, functional, or dimensional analysis.Therefore, a manufacturing non-conformance was unable to be determined.A review of the dhr and lot history did not provide any indication that a manufacturing non-conformance would have contributed to the complaint event.A review of the ifu and training manuals revealed no deficiencies.As reported, ''the initial problem was that it was not able to pass the septum with the sapien 3 ultra 26mm, even though it was pre-dilated it with a 12mm balloon.'' per the training manuals, difficulty crossing the septal wall can be caused by the following factors: flexing delivery system incorrectly, orienting e-logo incorrectly, patient anatomy not accurately assessed, and user torques delivery system, balloon shaft not locked after valve alignment.However, without applicable patient/procedural imaging, a definitive root cause was unable to be determined.No ifu/labeling/training manual inadequacies were identified.Therefore, no corrective or preventative action nor product risk assessment (pra) is required at this time for the complaint of balloon leak, as reported, ''due to the massive manipulation that had been required the crossing maneuvers attempts, it was noticed that the balloon was damaged with anticipated partial rupture of the balloon''.To overcome the reported difficulty, excessive manipulation was likely required during attempts to cross the septal wall.It is possible that this manipulation caused the balloon to become damaged, resulting in the reported balloon leak.Without applicable patient/procedural imaging, a definitive root cause was unable to be determined.Available information suggests that procedural factors (excessive manipulation) may have contributed to the reported event.No ifu/labeling/training manual inadequacies were identified.Therefore, no corrective or preventative action nor pra is required at this time.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, MITRAL VALVE, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key13983168
MDR Text Key297948011
Report Number2015691-2022-04792
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPU
UDI-Device Identifier00690103208078
UDI-Public(01)00690103208078(17)230928(10)64009594
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/06/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/01/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/28/2023
Device Model Number9610TF26U
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot Number64009594
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received05/06/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured09/28/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-