H4 manufacturing date added.D4 expiration date added.Due to the automated mes system there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.The product was not returned for analysis therefore the visual and functional inspection was not performed.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported complaint could not be confirmed, and it could not be definitively determined if the device failed to meet specifications because the product was not returned.Additional information provided by the customer indicated the microcatheter had been damaged distally, making it impossible to reinsert the stent into the catheter.The damage may be secondary to the handling of the stent and the force of the push when the first stent was deployed.There was no unanticipated medical intervention as the device was replaced by another flow diverter.There was no harm to the patient, the 2 device deficiencies did not lead to an ae (based on edc).The patient¿s current condition is no ae.While there are a number of potential causes for the reported issue, because review and analysis of available information failed to identify a definitive cause, a cause of undeterminable was assigned for the reported stent deployed prematurely during use.
|