|
Model Number 380652-46 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Abdominal Pain (1685); Urinary Tract Infection (2120); Fluid Discharge (2686)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Based on the current information provided, the root causes of the patients' reported postoperative complications cannot be determined or are unknown.
There is no allegation that a malfunction of a da vinci system, instrument, or accessory occurred.
If additional information is received, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
There was no image or video clip supplied for review related to a specific event.
System or instrument log reviews could not be performed due to a lack of system, procedure, and instrument detail.
This complaint is being reported due to the following conclusion: within the journal article titled, ¿transvesical approach in robot-assisted bladder diverticulectomy: surgical technique and outcome," it is noted that a patient experienced low abdominal pain after catheter removal and was treated with interertion of a transurethral catheter for an additional 5 days.
At this time the root cause of the post-operative abdominal pain is unknown.
There is no allegation that a malfunction of a da vinci system, instrument, or accessory occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
On 11-mar-2022, intuitive became aware of a "journal of endourology" article titled, ¿transvesical approach in robot-assisted bladder diverticulectomy: surgical ttechnique and outcome¿ (develtere, d.
, mazzone, e.
, et al.
, 2022).
The outcomes of 23 patients who underwent a transvesical robot-assisted bladder diverticulectomy (rabd) between march 2015 and may 2020 were analyzed.
Within the journal article, post-operative complications involving a da vinci surgical procedure were noted.
¿one patient experienced low abdominal pain after catheter removal which was suspicious for urinary leakage and was treated with insertion of a transurethral catheter for additional 5 days (with complete symptom resolution after catheter removal).
One patient developed a uti.
No other early postoperative complications were recorded.
" additionally, no intra-operative complications were reported and no late post-operative complications were recorded.
Isi has reached out to the author to obtain additional information but has not yet received a response.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|